IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v19y2010i7p1229-1243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge Generation and Innovativeness in Turkish Textile Industry: Comparison of Istanbul and Denizli

Author

Listed:
  • Yaprak Gülcan
  • Sedef Akgüngör
  • Yeşim Kuştepeli

Abstract

Regional innovation system (RIS) requires that two subsystems co-exist in a region: The first subsystem is the knowledge exploitation structure of the industrial base (symbolic, synthetic and analytic knowledge bases) [Moodysson, J., Coenen, L. & Asheim, B. (2008) Explaining spatial patterns of innovation: Analytical and synthetic modes of knowledge creation in the Medicon Valley life science cluster, Environment and Planning A , 40(5), pp. 1040--1056]. The second subsystem is the regional supportive infrastructure or knowledge-generating subsystem which consists of firms, educational institutions, knowledge organizations and other similar infrastructural bases in the region. The objective of the paper is to compare two textile-related clusters in Turkey with respect to the strengths and weaknesses of the RIS. The first region is Istanbul with a textile and fashion design cluster, the second region is Denizli which is an example of a traditional export-oriented centre for bathrobe and home textiles. Results of the empirical findings prove that the two regions having different knowledge bases and RISs have different deficiencies in innovative performance even if they are the subsectors of the same sector (textiles).

Suggested Citation

  • Yaprak Gülcan & Sedef Akgüngör & Yeşim Kuştepeli, 2010. "Knowledge Generation and Innovativeness in Turkish Textile Industry: Comparison of Istanbul and Denizli," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(7), pages 1229-1243, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:19:y:2010:i:7:p:1229-1243
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2011.573134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654313.2011.573134
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654313.2011.573134?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:19:y:2010:i:7:p:1229-1243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.