IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eujhet/v17y2010i5p1183-1222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technical progress, capital accumulation and income distribution in Classical economics: Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Karl Marx

Author

Listed:
  • Heinz Kurz

Abstract

The paper discusses the analyses of technical progress, capital accumulation and income distribution elaborated by three major classical economists: Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Karl Marx. The interpretation given is partly inspired by Piero Sraffa's studies in his hitherto unpublished papers. It will be argued that in the classical authors we encounter a sophisticated typology of different forms of technical change and an analysis of the different effects these have. These forms can be analysed in terms of shifts of the inverse relationship between the general rate of profits and wages, or wage frontier. The emphasis will be on Adam Smith's concept of the division of labour, Ricardo's analysis of the substitution of machine power for labour power, and Marx's adaptation of Ricardo's argument to his own analytical framework in terms of a rising organic composition of capital.

Suggested Citation

  • Heinz Kurz, 2010. "Technical progress, capital accumulation and income distribution in Classical economics: Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Karl Marx," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 1183-1222.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:17:y:2010:i:5:p:1183-1222
    DOI: 10.1080/09672567.2010.522242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09672567.2010.522242
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09672567.2010.522242?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Riccardo Bellofiore (ed.), 1998. "Marxian Economics: A Reappraisal," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-26121-5.
    2. Riccardo Bellofiore (ed.), 1998. "Marxian Economics: A Reappraisal," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-26118-5.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miguel D. Ramirez, 2018. "The Organic Composition of Capital and Technological Unemployment: Marx's and Ricardo's Intellectual Debt to John Barton and George Ramsay," Working Papers 1708, Trinity College, Department of Economics, revised Aug 2020.
    2. Gunther Tichy, 2016. "Geht der Arbeitsgesellschaft die Arbeit aus?," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 89(12), pages 853-871, December.
    3. Heinz D. Kurz, 2017. "Is there a “Ricardian Vice”? And what is its relationship with economic policy ad“vice”?," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 91-114, January.
    4. Kurz, Heinz D., 2018. "Stigler on Ricardo," Centro Sraffa Working Papers CSWP27, Centro di Ricerche e Documentazione "Piero Sraffa".
    5. Kurz, Heinz D., 2022. "Re-reading Carl Menger’s Grundsätze. A Book That “Cries Out To Be Surpassed”," Centro Sraffa Working Papers CSWP52, Centro di Ricerche e Documentazione "Piero Sraffa".
    6. Arrigo Opocher, 2010. "Measuring productivity increase by long-run prices: the early analyses of G.R. Porter and R. Giffen," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 1271-1291.
    7. David Haas, 2016. "The evolutionary traverse: a causal analysis," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 1173-1193, December.
    8. Heinz Kurz, 2012. "Schumpeter’s new combinations," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 871-899, November.
    9. Eric Kemp-Benedict, 2022. "A classical-evolutionary model of technological change," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1303-1343, September.
    10. Freni, Giuseppe & Salvadori, Neri, 2016. "Ricardo on Machinery: A Textual Analysis," MPRA Paper 73427, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Jonathan F. Cogliano & Roberto Veneziani & Naoki Yoshihara, 2022. "Computational methods and classical‐Marxian economics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 310-349, April.
    12. Charpe, Matthieu & Bridji, Slim & Mcadam, Peter, 2020. "Labor Share And Growth In The Long Run," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(7), pages 1720-1757, October.
    13. Muhammad Murtaza & Muhammad Ayyoub & Aisha Riaz & Riaz Ahmed, 2023. "Examining Linkages between Poverty Alleviation and Macroeconomic Performance in Pakistan," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 9(2), pages 665-678.
    14. Andrea Ricci, 2016. "Unequal Exchange in International Trade:A General Model," Working Papers 1605, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Department of Economics, Society & Politics - Scientific Committee - L. Stefanini & G. Travaglini, revised 2016.
    15. Sangjun Jeong, 2017. "Biased Technical Change and Economic Growth: The Case of Korea, 1970–2013," Research in Political Economy, in: Return of Marxian Macro-Dynamics in East Asia, volume 32, pages 81-103, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    16. Miguel D. Ramirez, 2019. "Marx and Ricardo on machinery: a critical note," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 81-100, January.
    17. Eric Kemp‐Benedict, 2020. "Convergence of actual, warranted, and natural growth rates in a Kaleckian–Harrodian‐classical model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(4), pages 851-881, November.
    18. Eric Kemp-Benedict & Yun K. Kim, 2018. "Technological Change, Household Debt, and Distribution," Working Papers 2018-02, University of Massachusetts Boston, Economics Department.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:17:y:2010:i:5:p:1183-1222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJH20 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.