IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/defpea/v8y1997i2p225-241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating non-transparent military expenditures: The case of china (PRC)

Author

Listed:
  • Digby Waller

Abstract

Data limitations arising from non-transparency in military expenditure reporting impose significant constraints on economists studying country and comparative developments in this field. This article focuses on the case of China. It reviews the recent literature on China's military expenditure, examines the variance in published estimates, and identifies three factors which help explain the variance: budgetary falsification; non-budgeted PLA revenue; and the US dollar purchasing-power parity of the yuan. Conclusions emphasize important policy implications of such variance and suggest a more active role for defence economists in a field of research generating considerable attention from international relations scholars.

Suggested Citation

  • Digby Waller, 1997. "Estimating non-transparent military expenditures: The case of china (PRC)," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 225-241.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:8:y:1997:i:2:p:225-241
    DOI: 10.1080/10430719708404877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10430719708404877
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10430719708404877?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chiwei Su & Yingying Xu & Hsu Ling Chang & Oana-Ramona Lobont & Zhixin Liu, 2020. "Dynamic Causalities between Defense Expenditure and Economic Growth in China: Evidence from Rolling Granger Causality Test," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 565-582, July.
    2. Chen Bing-Fu & Zhao Liming, 2006. "The Determinants of China's Defense Expenditure Before and After Transition," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 23(3), pages 227-244, July.
    3. Liming Zhao & Liang Zhao & Bing-Fu Chen, 2017. "The interrelationship between defence spending, public expenditures and economic growth: evidence from China," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(6), pages 703-718, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:8:y:1997:i:2:p:225-241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GDPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.