IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v29y2011i3p247-260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysing the structure of public-private partnership projects using network theory

Author

Listed:
  • Abu Naser Chowdhury
  • Po-Han Chen
  • Robert Tiong

Abstract

In public-private partnership projects (PPP), the relationships between the participants are established through a variety of contractual agreements between financiers, government, contractors, operators and customers. Raising funds, linking various participants legally and financially, ensuring supply, and producing and marketing products depend on well-established financial and legal structures of PPP. Though numerous research studies have been conducted to establish and justify the structure of PPP projects based on contractual agreements between participating stakeholders and on existing legal frameworks of a host country, there are still questions left unanswered. Examples are: What are the factors that influence the structuring of PPP? Who are the key stakeholders? And what are the roles of participating partners in a PPP project? However, not much work has been done. Application of network theory can help fill these gaps and identify and distinguish potential stakeholders in PPP affiliation and can effectively contribute to an in-depth analysis of the relationships between participating partners. The analysis can identify important features like core-peripheral stakeholder(s), influential intermediary participants and their interdependence, and influences of a PPP structure on its substantive outcome. With the introduction of the network theory, a more thorough analysis of PPP structures can be achieved which may provide valuable information to project sponsors as well as legal and financial advisers.

Suggested Citation

  • Abu Naser Chowdhury & Po-Han Chen & Robert Tiong, 2011. "Analysing the structure of public-private partnership projects using network theory," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 247-260.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:29:y:2011:i:3:p:247-260
    DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2010.537354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01446193.2010.537354
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446193.2010.537354?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang Dahui & Zhou Li & Di Zengru, 2005. "Bipartite Producer-Consumer Networks and the Size Distribution of Firms," Papers physics/0507163, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abraham Park & Chen Yu Chang, 2013. "Impacts of Construction Events on the Project Equity Value of the Channel Tunnel Project," ERES eres2013_97, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    2. Stjernström, Olof & Junker, Eivind & Thorsen, Hans Wilhelm, 2023. "The private in the public: The case of Norwegian private zoning plans," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    3. Mohammed Khaled Al-Hanawi & Sarh Almubark & Ameerah M N Qattan & Agnieszka Cenkier & Ewa Agnieszka Kosycarz, 2020. "Barriers to the implementation of public-private partnerships in the healthcare sector in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Chan Young Park & Wooyong Jung & Seung H. Han, 2020. "Risk Perception Gaps Between Construction Investors and Financial Investors of International Public–Private Partnership (PPP) Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Fakhri, Issaoui & Torkia, Boussif, 2016. "The Determinants of the Asymmetric Power Effects in the context of Public-Private Partnership negotiation (PPP): theoretical Analysis and basic assumptions," MPRA Paper 69750, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Ophelia Kaneva, 2021. "Public-private partnership in school education in Bulgaria: opportunities and constraints," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 6, pages 30-40.
    7. Silvia Rita Sedita & Roberta Apa, "undated". "Contractors networks in public procurement projects: The case of the construction industry in the Veneto region," "Marco Fanno" Working Papers 0193, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche "Marco Fanno".
    8. van Oosten, Thomas & Witte, Patrick & Hartmann, Thomas, 2018. "Active land policy in small municipalities in the Netherlands: “We don’t do it, unless...”," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 829-836.
    9. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Ryu, Youngbok, 2022. "Performance assessment on technology transition from small businesses to the U.S. Department of Defense," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    10. Liyin Shen & Vivian W.Y. Tam & Lin Gan & Kunhui Ye & Zongnan Zhao, 2016. "Improving Sustainability Performance for Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:29:y:2011:i:3:p:247-260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.