In the circuit of credibility: construction workers and the norms of 'a good job'
AbstractIn the contemporary managerial regime, managerial control is increasingly being maintained through indirect forms of control, centring on identities and ideologies and instituting the co-workers as enterprising, self-regulating subjects. The construction industry has, over time, managed to maintain a craft tradition whereby individual skills rather than engineered work routines have been favoured, resulting in management control largely having been decentralized to work teams. A study of construction work at three sites suggests that managerial control is embedded in collectively enacted norms concerning what constitutes 'good work'. The capacity to perform in accordance with such norms is translated into credibility, a reputation for being capable of adhering to the norms of good work. The construction industry and onsite construction work thus operate on the basis of an 'economy of reputation' or a 'circuit of credibility', prescribing what constitutes adequate performance and imposing sanctions on underachieving individuals or companies. Such norms and circuits of credibility serve to protect the role and status of construction workers and to maintain jurisdiction over fields of expertise, but they may also have a conservating effect on the industry, being severely criticized in terms of failing to bring about innovations and lower production costs.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Construction Management and Economics.
Volume (Year): 29 (2011)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.