Contractor pre-qualification can be regarded as a complicated, two-group, non-linear classification problem. It involves a variety of subjective and uncertain information extracted from various parties such as contractors, pre-qualifiers and project teams. Non-linearity, uncertainty and subjectivity are the three predominant characteristics of the contractor pre-qualification process. This makes the process more of an art than a scientific evaluation. In addition to non-linearity, uncertainty and subjectivity, contractor pre-qualification is further complicated by the large number of contractor pre-qualification criteria (CPC) used in current practice and the multicollinearity existing between contractor attributes. An alternative empirical method using principal component analysis (PCA) is proposed for contractor pre-qualification in this study. The proposed method may alleviate the existing amount of multicollinearity and largely reduce the dimensionality of the pre-qualification data set. The applicability and potential of PCA for contractor pre-qualification has been examined by way of two data sets: (1) 73 pre-qualification cases (37 qualified and 36 disqualified) collected in England and (2) 85 (45 qualified and 40 disqualified) pre-qualification cases relating to 10 public sector projects in Hong Kong. The PCA-based results demonstrated that strong and positive inter-correlations existed between most of the qualifying variables, with the minimum correlation coefficient being 0.121 and the maximum being 0.899, and that qualified and disqualified contractors could be satisfactorily separated.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 23 (2005) Issue (Month): 7 (September) Pages: 673-684 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: