IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v22y2004i2p141-150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valuing a price cap contract for material procurement as a real option

Author

Listed:
  • Francis Ng
  • Hans Bjornsson
  • Samuel Chiu

Abstract

This paper uses real option methodology to compare the cost of a long-term contract with a price cap to that of spot purchases in construction material procurement. In construction, material procurements are usually short-term, project-based and subject to high price volatility. These characteristics and the competitive nature of the industry lower the profit margin of contractors. We have observed that contractors purchase a stable amount of commodity materials such as concrete, structural steel and lumber year after year. For contractors, the price cap reduces the price volatility of materials without their being obliged to purchase a certain quantity; for suppliers, the price-cap contracts give them steady demand and a bigger market share. We evaluate this price-cap contract as a real option and find the contractor's optimal ordering policy. When materials are not frequently traded, we model price processes by using related market information and then evaluate the idiosyncratic uncertainties in a risk-neutral setting. Our methodology does not require market completeness and incorporates some of the results of the latest research in finance such as correlation pricing, option pricing and zero level pricing, as well as Monte Carlo simulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Francis Ng & Hans Bjornsson & Samuel Chiu, 2004. "Valuing a price cap contract for material procurement as a real option," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 141-150.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:22:y:2004:i:2:p:141-150
    DOI: 10.1080/0144619042000201349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0144619042000201349
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0144619042000201349?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:22:y:2004:i:2:p:141-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.