The underground economy in Spain: an alternative to unemployment?
AbstractThis paper analyses the factors which determine whether an individual works in the formal sector, in the informal sector, or remains unemployed in the Spanish labour market. We highlight the implications of high unemployment on an individual's decision to work in the underground economy. We postulate that an individual decides (or is chosen) whether to work in the formal sector or not in a first stage and, if not, in a second stage decides whether to work in the underground sector or to remain unemployed. We estimate a bivariate probit model which controls for selectivity bias in the second stage. The result indicates on the one hand, that heads of household, who benefit more from social security provisions obtained in formal sector jobs, are more likely to work in such sector than others. Besides, demand restrictions seem to operate as well-individuals with higher education have easier access to the formal sector. On the other hand, among those who do not work in the formal sector, the probability of working in the informal sector relative to being unemployed is higher among those whose head of household works. For females, the probability of staying unemployed (relative to working in the informal sector) increases with education, suggesting that highly educated women prefer to search for a formal sector job rather than to work in the underground economy. We also examine the job search behaviour among the informal sector workers.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Applied Economics.
Volume (Year): 29 (1997)
Issue (Month): 6 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page. reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.