Pricing and quality option in Japanese government bond futures
AbstractAn empirical study of the Hull - White model for pricing Treasury bond futures contracts with quality option is presented. Japanese long-term Government Bond (JGB) futures contracts are chosen, because unlike US Treasury bond futures contracts, which embed both the quality and timing options, the JGB contracts contain only the quality option. Interest rate model parameters are estimated using a simple regression technique and the yield curve is smoothed by B-spline functions with a correction for heteroscedasticity. By applying a discrete trinomial tree approach proposed by Hull and White, the quality option embedded in the JGB futures is then determined by the difference between the theoretical futures prices for contracts with and without allowing multiple deliverable grades. Without the addition of other timing options, the value of the pure quality option is less significant compared to those of other empirical studies. It is approximately 0.02 percentage points of par three months prior to delivery. In this study, it is demonstrated that the Hull - White model is simple and computationally efficient.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Applied Financial Economics.
Volume (Year): 9 (1999)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAFE20
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Henrard, Marc, 2006. "Bonds futures and their options: more than the cheapest-to-deliver; quality option and marginning," MPRA Paper 2001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Kang, Jangkoo & Park, Hyoung-Jin, 2006. "Tests of alternate models for the pricing of Korean Treasury bond futures contracts," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 410-425, September.
- Wang, Ping & Liu, Aying & Wang, Peijie, 2004. "Return and risk interactions in Chinese stock markets," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 367-383, October.
- Alejandro balbas & Susana Reichardt, 2006. "On The Future Contract Quality Option: A New Look," Business Economics Working Papers wb063711, Universidad Carlos III, Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.