This study examines income and food consumption patterns within Chinese households to test the assumptions and predictions of two competing models of consumer demand, the Neo-Classical unitary model and a class of bargaining models. Four standard tests of the Neo-Classical model are conducted, as well as two tests of bargaining models recently developed by Chiappori and Browning (1998). Similar to many other studies, each of the assumptions and predictions of the Neo-Classical unitary model is rejected by the data. Alternatively, there is evidence that the bargaining models more accurately describe households' decision-making processes. The data suggest that multiple individuals within the household influence decisions, instead of households acting as one decision-making unit.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.