Investors reaction to dividend announcements: parametric versus nonparametric approach
AbstractSince the seminal works of Ball and Brown (1968) and Fama et al. (1969), event studies have served an important purpose in capital market research as away of testing stock price reaction towards a particular event. The ordinary least squares estimation method (OLS) has been employed in most extant research. However, if the assumed normality assumption is violated, then the OLS procedure will produce bias estimate to abnormal returns. Therefore, some authors (e.g. Dombrow et al., 2000) suggest a nonparametric approach to estimate the market model such as Theil (1950). This paper aims to examine investors' behavior prior to dividend announcements. The results indicate that the daily abnormal returns depart considerably from normality and that Theil's estimation procedure produces higher standardized abnormal returns than that of the OLS estimation procedure. Furthermore, the results confirm that investors achieve positive abnormal returns in the pre-announcement period. This paper concludes that some investors have access to information prior to become public.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Taylor and Francis Journals in its journal Applied Financial Economics Letters.
Volume (Year): 3 (2007)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAFL20
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.