Job destruction through quits or layoffs?
AbstractIt is demonstrated that for existing firms quits are important in the destruction of jobs. Although layoffs are relatively more used than quits, it is found that in absolute terms a substantial part of the destruction is accomplished through quits.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Applied Economics Letters.
Volume (Year): 7 (2000)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Pierre Koning & Daniel van Vuuren, 2010.
"Disability insurance and unemployment insurance as substitute pathways,"
Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(5), pages 575-588.
- Pierre Koning & Daniel van Vuuren, 2006. "Disability insurance and unemployment insurance as substitute pathways," CPB Discussion Paper 70, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
- Annemiek van Vuren & Daniel van Vuuren, 2005.
"Financial incentives in disability insurance in the Netherlands,"
CPB Discussion Paper
45, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
- Annemiek Vuren & Daniel Vuuren, 2007. "Financial Incentives in Disability Insurance in the Netherlands," De Economist, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 73-98, March.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.