IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v67y2013i2p82-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating Omissions From Searches

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony J. Webster
  • Richard Kemp

Abstract

The mark-recapture method was devised by Petersen in 1896 to estimate the number of fish migrating into the Limfjord, and independently by Lincoln in 1930 to estimate waterfowl abundance. The technique can be applied to any search for a finite number of items by two or more people or agents, allowing the number of searched-for items to be estimated. This ubiquitous problem appears in fields from ecology and epidemiology, through to mathematics, social sciences, and computing. Here, we exactly calculate the moments of the hypergeometric distribution associated with this longstanding problem, confirming that widely used estimates conjectured in 1951 are often too small. Our Bayesian approach highlights how different search strategies will modify the estimates. The estimates are applied to several examples. For some published applications, substantial errors are found to result from using the Chapman or Lincoln--Petersen estimates. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony J. Webster & Richard Kemp, 2013. "Estimating Omissions From Searches," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(2), pages 82-89, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:67:y:2013:i:2:p:82-89
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2013.783881
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2013.783881
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2013.783881?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:67:y:2013:i:2:p:82-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.