IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accted/v23y2014i3p225-243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self- and Peer-Assessment: Evidence from the Accounting and Finance Discipline

Author

Listed:
  • Omaima A. G. Hassan
  • Alison Fox
  • Gwen Hannah

Abstract

Self- and peer-assessment of student work is an area that is under-researched in the accounting education literature, although the subject area of study seems to influence the results obtained in prior studies. The current study contributes to the literature by examining the accuracy and construct validity of self- and peer-assessment by accounting students. It also investigates students' views about these exercises. The findings show that whilst the self- and peer-assessment of students appear to be neither accurate nor valid, the students are positive about the impact of these procedures on their learning experience. These findings indicate that, although instructors might not rely on self- and peer-assessment as measures of students' performance for the purpose of summative assessment, the exercise may prove useful for formative assessment because it can promote a wide range of transferable skills.

Suggested Citation

  • Omaima A. G. Hassan & Alison Fox & Gwen Hannah, 2014. "Self- and Peer-Assessment: Evidence from the Accounting and Finance Discipline," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 225-243, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:23:y:2014:i:3:p:225-243
    DOI: 10.1080/09639284.2014.905259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09639284.2014.905259
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09639284.2014.905259?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patricia Mccourt Larres & Joan Ballantine & Mark Whittington, 2003. "Evaluating the validity of self-assessment: measuring computer literacy among entry-level undergraduates within accounting degree programmes at two UK universities," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 97-112.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bhavani Sridharan & Mohammad Badrul Muttakin & Dessalegn Getie Mihret, 2018. "Students’ perceptions of peer assessment effectiveness: an explorative study," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 259-285, May.
    2. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E., 2015. "Accounting education literature review (2013–2014)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 69-127.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Watty, Kim & McKay, Jade & Ngo, Leanne, 2016. "Innovators or inhibitors? Accounting faculty resistance to new educational technologies in higher education," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-15.
    2. Iuliana Mariana IONESCU & Bogdan Stefan IONESCU & Florin MIHAI, 2012. "Improving The Learning Methodology For The Higher Accounting Education In Romania," Annals of University of Craiova - Economic Sciences Series, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 2(40), pages 31-48.
    3. Marta Palczyńska & Maja Rynko, 2021. "ICT skills measurement in social surveys: Can we trust self-reports?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 917-943, June.
    4. Richard T. Grenci, 2013. "Positioning Computer Literacy As A Valueadded Business Core Course," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(1), pages 67-80.
    5. Tanya Hill, 2016. "Do accounting students believe in self-assessment?," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 291-305, July.
    6. Florin Mihai & Bogdan Stefan Ionescu & Iuliana Mariana Ionescu & Laura Tudoran, 2012. "It&C Applications In Cabinets Of Accounting Expertise: Theoretical And Empirical Exploration," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(14), pages 1-7.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:23:y:2014:i:3:p:225-243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAED20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.