IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acbsfi/v17y2007i2p265-283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Reason Why: The English Constitution and the Latent Promise of Liberty in the History of Accounting

Author

Listed:
  • Warwick Funnell

Abstract

In 1215 Magna Carta determined freedom from executive oppression, or liberty, as the essential principle of the English Constitution and parliament as the bulwark against executive attempts to diminish the liberty of individuals. This constitutional precedence of liberty was confirmed after the Revolution in 1688 by the constitutional settlement which strengthened the financial accountability of the executive to parliament. Regular accounting for military expenditures especially became a critical component of the new accountability measures. Despite the overwhelming significance of liberty for the English Constitution and the contributions of accounting to preserving liberty, public sector accounting continues to attract few accounting historians. As a consequence, the vast historical resources contained in British Parliamentary Papers and the records of parliamentary debates continue to go largely unnoticed by all but a few accounting historians.

Suggested Citation

  • Warwick Funnell, 2007. "The Reason Why: The English Constitution and the Latent Promise of Liberty in the History of Accounting," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 265-283.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:17:y:2007:i:2:p:265-283
    DOI: 10.1080/09585200701376618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09585200701376618
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09585200701376618?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard K. Fleischman & David Oldroyd & Thomas N. Tyson, 2011. "The efficacy/inefficacy of accounting in controlling labour during the transition from slavery in the United States and British West Indies," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(6), pages 751-780, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:17:y:2007:i:2:p:265-283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABF21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.