IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/srb/journl/y2013i5-6p386-400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Importance Of Institutions In Terms Of Competitiveness Improvement And Economic Success

Author

Listed:
  • Vlastimir Leković

    (University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Economics)

Abstract

In view of the fact that competition constitutes one of the key postulates of the economic prosperity of both the national economy and its economic entities, this paper brings to attention the need for its continuous improvement. Improvement of competitiveness of a national economy is the most reliable way to achieve economic growth and development, and thus improve the prosperity of the citizens. In this regard, the paper discusses different theoretical approaches to this important economic problem and analyzes the key factors of economic competitiveness. In accordance with the subject of this research, the emphasis is given to the importance of institutions, since they are crucial for creating a competitive business environment and improving competitiveness and economic success. The research implies that it is necessary to determine the level of competitiveness, as well as the state of basic economic institutions, in order to identify both strengths and weaknesses of the national economy as preconditions for the creation and implementation of relevant competitiveness and economic success improvement policies. Such approach is particularly important for overcoming devastating economic conditions in Serbia, which have been present for many years. The paper stresses the importance of the enforcement of contracts and property rights, judicial independence, quality and professionalism of public administration, as key institutions in Serbia’s economy which must be consistently regulated in order to be able to contribute to improving the national economy competitiveness. Furthermore, it is pointed out that the institutions, by creating a favorable environment for successful development of economic activities, represent a very important factor in improving the competitiveness of the national economy, and hence provide a solid basis for the long-term growth and development.

Suggested Citation

  • Vlastimir Leković, 2013. "Importance Of Institutions In Terms Of Competitiveness Improvement And Economic Success," Serbian Association of Economists Journal, SAE - Serbian Association of Economists, issue 5-6, pages 386-400, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:srb:journl:y:2013:i:5-6:p:386-400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ses.org.rs/ekonomika-preduzeca/2013-5-6-08.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. North, Douglass C, 1994. "Economic Performance through Time," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(3), pages 359-368, June.
    2. Krugman, Paul R, 1996. "Making Sense of the Competitiveness Debate," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 12(3), pages 17-25, Autumn.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pantelis C. Kostis, 2022. "Economic Development and Performance of Eurozone Economies: The Growing Imbalances During the Crisis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1056-1075, June.
    2. Pérez-Moreno, Salvador & Bárcena-Martín, Elena & Ritzen, Jo, 2017. "Institutional diversity in the Euro area : Any evidence of convergence?," MERIT Working Papers 2017-047, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    3. Engelhardt, Sebastian v. & Freytag, Andreas, 2013. "Institutions, culture, and open source," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 90-110.
    4. Schmid, Andreas, 2007. "Incentive Compatibility and Efficiency in the contractual Insurer-Provider Relationship: Economic Theory and practical Implications: The Case of North Carolina," MPRA Paper 23311, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2008.
    5. Jacques Fontanel, 2000. "L’Etat, garant de l’intérêt général ou de certains intérêts particuliers," Post-Print hal-02880886, HAL.
    6. Carlos Esteban Posada, 1998. "Los mercados de instituciones y las instituciones endogenas," Lecturas de Economía, Universidad de Antioquia, Departamento de Economía, issue 48, pages 149-168, Enero Jun.
    7. Michael Stuetzer & David B. Audretsch & Martin Obschonka & Samuel D. Gosling & Peter J. Rentfrow & Jeff Potter, 2018. "Entrepreneurship culture, knowledge spillovers and the growth of regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(5), pages 608-618, May.
    8. Clarisse Cazals & A. Rivaud, 2014. "Sectoral heritage and performances of aquaculture [Patrimoine sectoriel et performances le cas de l'aquaculture]," Post-Print hal-01581325, HAL.
    9. Farla, Kristine, 2012. "Institutions and credit," MERIT Working Papers 2012-038, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    10. Banterle, Alessandro & Stranieri, Stefanella, 2008. "The consequences of voluntary traceability system for supply chain relationships. An application of transaction cost economics," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 560-569, December.
    11. Luis Alfonso Dau & Aya S. Chacar & Marjorie A. Lyles & Jiatao Li, 2022. "Informal institutions and international business: Toward an integrative research agenda," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 985-1010, August.
    12. Brian J. L. Berry, 1995. "Whither Regional Science?," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 17(3), pages 297-305, July.
    13. Jonathan D. Ritschel, 2012. "Efficacy of US Legislation in Military Acquisition Programmes: N unn– M cCurdy Act Unveiled," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 31(4), pages 491-500, December.
    14. Gaoussou Diarra & Sébastien Marchand, 2011. "Environmental Compliance, Corruption and Governance: Theory and Evidence on Forest Stock in Developing Countries," Working Papers halshs-00557677, HAL.
    15. Michael Fritsch & Korneliusz Pylak & Michael Wyrwich, 2019. "Persistence of Entrepreneurship in Different Historical Contexts," Jena Economics Research Papers 2019-003, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    16. Marion Payen & Patrick Rondé, 2020. "Culture, Institutions and Economic Growth," Working Papers of BETA 2020-18, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    17. Coppola, A. & Ianuario, S. & Chinnici, G. & Di Vita, G. & Pappalardo, G. & D'Amico, D., 2018. "Endogenous and Exogenous Determinants of Agricultural Productivity: What Is the Most Relevant for the Competitiveness of the Italian Agricultural Systems?," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 10(2).
    18. Jefferson, Gary H., 1997. "China's economic future: A discussion paper," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 581-595.
    19. Jacques Fontanel, 2000. "L’arme économique et son application dans l’histoire contemporaine," Post-Print hal-02880893, HAL.
    20. Ying Ma & Abdul Jalil, 2008. "Financial Development, Economic Growth and Adaptive Efficiency: A Comparison between China and Pakistan," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 16(6), pages 97-111, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    institutional environment; competitiveness of the national economy; business environment; economic prosperity;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E00 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srb:journl:y:2013:i:5-6:p:386-400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Milos Stamatovic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/yueaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.