IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/wirtsc/v97y2017i10d10.1007_s10273-017-2205-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

20 Jahre EEG: Ist das Förderende für alte Anlagen ein Problem für die Energiewende?
[Does the Phase-out of Public Support for Existing Renewable Energy Plants Jeopardise Germany’s Energy Transition?]

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Lehmann

    (Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung)

  • Erik Gawel

    (Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung)

  • Klaas Korte

    (Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung)

  • Alexandra Purkus

    (Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung 2020 feiert das Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz sein 20-jähriges Jubiläum. Für Pioniere, die schon früh in Windräder, Photovoltaik- und Biomasseanlagen investiert haben, ist dies möglicherweise jedoch kein Grund zum Feiern, denn die gesetzlich garantierte Vergütung der Stromerzeugung läuft dann für die ersten Erneuerbare-Energien-Anlagen aus. Ob Bestandsanlagen ohne staatliche Förderung weiter rentabel sind, ist fraglich. Gingen sie vom Netz, so die Sorge, könnte das Erreichen der Energiewendeziele gefährdet werden. Aber sind diese Befürchtungen berechtigt? Und wenn ja, wie sollte die Politik darauf reagieren?

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Lehmann & Erik Gawel & Klaas Korte & Alexandra Purkus, 2017. "20 Jahre EEG: Ist das Förderende für alte Anlagen ein Problem für die Energiewende? [Does the Phase-out of Public Support for Existing Renewable Energy Plants Jeopardise Germany’s Energy Transition," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 97(10), pages 727-732, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:97:y:2017:i:10:d:10.1007_s10273-017-2205-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10273-017-2205-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10273-017-2205-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10273-017-2205-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barbara Glensk & Reinhard Madlener, 2019. "Energiewende @ Risk: On the Continuation of Renewable Power Generation at the End of Public Policy Support," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-25, September.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy
    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:97:y:2017:i:10:d:10.1007_s10273-017-2205-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.