IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v47y2013i6p3509-3520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interacting with a questionnaire: respondents’ constructions of questionnaire completion

Author

Listed:
  • Dariusz Galasiński
  • Olga Kozłowska

Abstract

This article explores informants’ constructions of the situation of completing a questionnaire. The data comes from a study qualitatively replicating a quantitative method in which informants were asked to think aloud when completing a questionnaire designed to identify and measure feelings and behaviours in the situation of a job loss. The thinking aloud data showed that the informants constructed the situation of completing the questionnaire as interaction and they engaged themselves in a complex social communication anchored in a local context. The article shows how the informants positioned themselves with regard to the activity of completing a questionnaire, how they constructed their choice of answers and, finally, how they positioned the psychologist who asked for the questionnaire to be completed. The article concludes by discussing potential consequences of the findings for psychological assessment in clinical practice and research. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Dariusz Galasiński & Olga Kozłowska, 2013. "Interacting with a questionnaire: respondents’ constructions of questionnaire completion," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 3509-3520, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:47:y:2013:i:6:p:3509-3520
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-012-9733-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-012-9733-0
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-012-9733-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:47:y:2013:i:6:p:3509-3520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.