IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v34y2000i1p17-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of χ2, RFA and IRT Based Procedures in the Detection of DIF

Author

Listed:
  • Juana Gómez-benito
  • María Navas-ara

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Juana Gómez-benito & María Navas-ara, 2000. "A Comparison of χ2, RFA and IRT Based Procedures in the Detection of DIF," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 17-31, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:34:y:2000:i:1:p:17-31
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1004703709442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1004703709442
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1004703709442?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nambury Raju, 1988. "The area between two item characteristic curves," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(4), pages 495-502, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jerry Welkenhuysen-Gybels & Jaak Billiet, 2002. "A Comparison of Techniques for Detecting Cross-Cultural Inequivalence at the Item Level," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 197-218, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meulders, Michel & De Boeck, Paul & Vandenberk, Miek, 2009. "Going beyond the detection of differential item functioning in tests for personnel selection," Working Papers 2009/40, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.
    2. Jerry Welkenhuysen-Gybels, 2004. "The Performance of Some Observed and Unobserved Conditional Invariance Techniques for the Detection of Differential Item Functioning," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 38(6), pages 681-702, December.
    3. Silvia Golia, 2015. "Assessing the impact of uniform and nonuniform differential item functioning items on Rasch measure: the polytomous case," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 441-461, June.
    4. M. Hidalgo & José López-Pina, 2011. "Item-fit evaluation in biased tests: a study under Rasch model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 715-734, April.
    5. Timo Bechger & Gunter Maris, 2015. "A Statistical Test for Differential Item Pair Functioning," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(2), pages 317-340, June.
    6. Gerhard Tutz & Gunther Schauberger, 2015. "A Penalty Approach to Differential Item Functioning in Rasch Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 21-43, March.
    7. Minjeong Jeon & Frank Rijmen & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2013. "Modeling Differential Item Functioning Using a Generalization of the Multiple-Group Bifactor Model," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 38(1), pages 32-60, February.
    8. Nadir ALTINOK & Claude DIEBOLT, 2023. "Cliometrics of Learning-Adjusted Years of Schooling: Evidence from a New Dataset," Working Papers of BETA 2023-02, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    9. Sandefur, Justin, 2018. "Internationally comparable mathematics scores for fourteen african countries," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 267-286.
    10. Matthew J. Madison & Laine P. Bradshaw, 2018. "Assessing Growth in a Diagnostic Classification Model Framework," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(4), pages 963-990, December.
    11. Ting Wang & Carolin Strobl & Achim Zeileis & Edgar C. Merkle, 2018. "Score-Based Tests of Differential Item Functioning via Pairwise Maximum Likelihood Estimation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(1), pages 132-155, March.
    12. Gerhard Tutz & Moritz Berger, 2016. "Item-focussed Trees for the Identification of Items in Differential Item Functioning," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(3), pages 727-750, September.
    13. Aura-Nidia Herrera & Juana Gómez, 2008. "Influence of equal or unequal comparison group sample sizes on the detection of differential item functioning using the Mantel–Haenszel and logistic regression techniques," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(6), pages 739-755, December.
    14. David Magis & Francis Tuerlinckx & Paul De Boeck, 2015. "Detection of Differential Item Functioning Using the Lasso Approach," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 40(2), pages 111-135, April.
    15. David Hessen, 2005. "Constant latent odds-ratios models and the mantel-haenszel null hypothesis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 497-516, September.
    16. Chen, Yunxiao & Li, Chengcheng & Ouyang, Jing & Xu, Gongjun, 2023. "DIF statistical inference without knowing anchoring items," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119923, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Jerry Welkenhuysen-Gybels & Jaak Billiet, 2002. "A Comparison of Techniques for Detecting Cross-Cultural Inequivalence at the Item Level," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 197-218, August.
    18. Gonthier, Corentin & Grégoire, Jacques & Besançon, Maud, 2021. "No negative Flynn effect in France: Why variations of intelligence should not be assessed using tests based on cultural knowledge," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    19. R. Philip Chalmers, 2018. "Model-Based Measures for Detecting and Quantifying Response Bias," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(3), pages 696-732, September.
    20. Jeanne A. Teresi & Chun Wang & Marjorie Kleinman & Richard N. Jones & David J. Weiss, 2021. "Differential Item Functioning Analyses of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Measures: Methods, Challenges, Advances, and Future Directions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(3), pages 674-711, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    differential item functioning;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:34:y:2000:i:1:p:17-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.