IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v78y2013i4p793-814.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling Dyadic Interaction with Hawkes Processes

Author

Listed:

Abstract

We apply the Hawkes process to the analysis of dyadic interaction. The Hawkes process is applicable to excitatory interactions, wherein the actions of each individual increase the probability of further actions in the near future. We consider the representation of the Hawkes process both as a conditional intensity function and as a cluster Poisson process. The former treats the probability of an action in continuous time via non-stationary distributions with arbitrarily long historical dependency, while the latter is conducive to maximum likelihood estimation using the EM algorithm. We first outline the interpretation of the Hawkes process in the dyadic context, and then illustrate its application with an example concerning email transactions in the work place. Copyright The Psychometric Society 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Halpin & Paul Boeck, 2013. "Modelling Dyadic Interaction with Hawkes Processes," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 793-814, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:78:y:2013:i:4:p:793-814
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-013-9329-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11336-013-9329-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-013-9329-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Jamshidian & R. I. Jennrich, 2000. "Standard errors for EM estimation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 62(2), pages 257-270.
    2. Marc A. Scott, 2011. "Affinity models for career sequences," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 60(3), pages 417-436, May.
    3. Ellen Hamaker & Zhiyong Zhang & Han Maas, 2009. "Using Threshold Autoregressive Models to Study Dyadic Interactions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 727-745, December.
    4. Veen, Alejandro & Schoenberg, Frederic P., 2008. "Estimation of SpaceTime Branching Process Models in Seismology Using an EMType Algorithm," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 614-624, June.
    5. Isham, Valerie & Westcott, Mark, 1979. "A self-correcting point process," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 335-347, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vipul Aggarwal & Elina H. Hwang & Yong Tan, 2021. "Learning to Be Creative: A Mutually Exciting Spatiotemporal Point Process Model for Idea Generation in Open Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1214-1235, December.
    2. Laurent Lesage & Madalina Deaconu & Antoine Lejay & Jorge Augusto Meira & Geoffrey Nichil & Radu State, 2022. "Hawkes processes framework with a Gamma density as excitation function: application to natural disasters for insurance," Post-Print hal-03040090, HAL.
    3. Laurent Lesage & Madalina Deaconu & Antoine Lejay & Jorge Augusto Meira & Geoffrey Nichil & Radu State, 2022. "Hawkes Processes Framework With a Gamma Density As Excitation Function: Application to Natural Disasters for Insurance," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2509-2537, December.
    4. Li, Zhongping & Cui, Lirong & Chen, Jianhui, 2018. "Traffic accident modelling via self-exciting point processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 312-320.
    5. Laurent Lesage & Madalina Deaconu & Antoine Lejay & Jorge Augusto Meira & Geoffrey Nichil & Radu State, 2020. "Hawkes processes framework with a Gamma density as excitation function: application to natural disasters for insurance," Working Papers hal-03040090, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vipul Aggarwal & Elina H. Hwang & Yong Tan, 2021. "Learning to Be Creative: A Mutually Exciting Spatiotemporal Point Process Model for Idea Generation in Open Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1214-1235, December.
    2. Scalas, Enrico & Kaizoji, Taisei & Kirchler, Michael & Huber, Jürgen & Tedeschi, Alessandra, 2006. "Waiting times between orders and trades in double-auction markets," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 366(C), pages 463-471.
    3. Marc A. Scott & Kaushik Mohan & Jacques‐Antoine Gauthier, 2020. "Model‐based clustering and analysis of life history data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(3), pages 1231-1251, June.
    4. Dirick, Lore & Claeskens, Gerda & Vasnev, Andrey & Baesens, Bart, 2022. "A hierarchical mixture cure model with unobserved heterogeneity for credit risk," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 39-55.
    5. Mohler, George, 2014. "Marked point process hotspot maps for homicide and gun crime prediction in Chicago," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 491-497.
    6. Chiang, Wen-Hao & Liu, Xueying & Mohler, George, 2022. "Hawkes process modeling of COVID-19 with mobility leading indicators and spatial covariates," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 505-520.
    7. Karl, Andrew T. & Yang, Yan & Lohr, Sharon L., 2014. "Computation of maximum likelihood estimates for multiresponse generalized linear mixed models with non-nested, correlated random effects," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 146-162.
    8. Chenlong Li & Zhanjie Song & Wenjun Wang, 2020. "Space–time inhomogeneous background intensity estimators for semi-parametric space–time self-exciting point process models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(4), pages 945-967, August.
    9. Hautphenne, Sophie & Fackrell, Mark, 2014. "An EM algorithm for the model fitting of Markovian binary trees," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 19-34.
    10. Leila Amiri & Mojtaba Khazaei & Mojtaba Ganjali, 2018. "A mixture latent variable model for modeling mixed data in heterogeneous populations and its applications," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 102(1), pages 95-115, January.
    11. Julio A. Crego, 2017. "Short Selling Ban and Intraday Dynamics," Working Papers wp2018_1715, CEMFI.
    12. Zhu, Lingjiong, 2013. "Ruin probabilities for risk processes with non-stationary arrivals and subexponential claims," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 544-550.
    13. Eric W. Fox & Martin B. Short & Frederic P. Schoenberg & Kathryn D. Coronges & Andrea L. Bertozzi, 2016. "Modeling E-mail Networks and Inferring Leadership Using Self-Exciting Point Processes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(514), pages 564-584, April.
    14. Poncela, Pilar & Ruiz, Esther & Miranda, Karen, 2021. "Factor extraction using Kalman filter and smoothing: This is not just another survey," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1399-1425.
    15. Wheatley, Spencer & Filimonov, Vladimir & Sornette, Didier, 2016. "The Hawkes process with renewal immigration & its estimation with an EM algorithm," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 120-135.
    16. Giada Adelfio & Arianna Agosto & Marcello Chiodi & Paolo Giudici, 2021. "Financial contagion through space-time point processes," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(2), pages 665-688, June.
    17. Jakob G. Rasmussen & Heidi S. Christensen, 2021. "Point Processes on Directed Linear Networks," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 647-667, June.
    18. Angelos Dassios & Hongbiao Zhao, 2017. "A Generalized Contagion Process With An Application To Credit Risk," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(01), pages 1-33, February.
    19. Tingting Huang & Gilbert Saporta & Huiwen Wang & Shanshan Wang, 2021. "A robust spatial autoregressive scalar-on-function regression with t-distribution," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 15(1), pages 57-81, March.
    20. Philip A. White & Alan E. Gelfand, 2021. "Generalized Evolutionary Point Processes: Model Specifications and Model Comparison," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1001-1021, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:78:y:2013:i:4:p:793-814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.