IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comgts/v3y2006i1p55-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An adaptive Monte Carlo algorithm for computing mixed logit estimators

Author

Listed:
  • Fabian Bastin
  • Cinzia Cirillo
  • Philippe Toint

Abstract

Researchers and analysts are increasingly using mixed logit models for estimating responses to forecast demand and to determine the factors that affect individual choices. However the numerical cost associated to their evaluation can be prohibitive, the inherent probability choices being represented by multidimensional integrals. This cost remains high even if Monte Carlo or quasi-Monte Carlo techniques are used to estimate those integrals. This paper describes a new algorithm that uses Monte Carlo approximations in the context of modern trust-region techniques, but also exploits accuracy and bias estimators to considerably increase its computational efficiency. Numerical experiments underline the importance of the choice of an appropriate optimisation technique and indicate that the proposed algorithm allows substantial gains in time while delivering more information to the practitioner. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 2006

Suggested Citation

  • Fabian Bastin & Cinzia Cirillo & Philippe Toint, 2006. "An adaptive Monte Carlo algorithm for computing mixed logit estimators," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 55-79, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:comgts:v:3:y:2006:i:1:p:55-79
    DOI: 10.1007/s10287-005-0044-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10287-005-0044-y
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10287-005-0044-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kuo-Hao Chang & L. Jeff Hong & Hong Wan, 2013. "Stochastic Trust-Region Response-Surface Method (STRONG)---A New Response-Surface Framework for Simulation Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 230-243, May.
    2. Carolina Osorio & Michel Bierlaire, 2013. "A Simulation-Based Optimization Framework for Urban Transportation Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(6), pages 1333-1345, December.
    3. Emelogu, Adindu & Chowdhury, Sudipta & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Bian, Linkan & Eksioglu, Burak, 2016. "An enhanced sample average approximation method for stochastic optimization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 230-252.
    4. Nataša Krejić & Nataša Krklec Jerinkić, 2019. "Spectral projected gradient method for stochastic optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 59-81, January.
    5. Wang, Xinchang, 2016. "Optimal allocation of limited and random network resources to discrete stochastic demands for standardized cargo transportation networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 310-331.
    6. Jeffrey Larson & Stephen C. Billups, 2016. "Stochastic derivative-free optimization using a trust region framework," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 64(3), pages 619-645, July.
    7. Stefania Bellavia & Nataša Krejić & Benedetta Morini, 2020. "Inexact restoration with subsampled trust-region methods for finite-sum minimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 76(3), pages 701-736, July.
    8. Johannes Royset, 2013. "On sample size control in sample average approximations for solving smooth stochastic programs," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 265-309, June.
    9. Munger, D. & L’Ecuyer, P. & Bastin, F. & Cirillo, C. & Tuffin, B., 2012. "Estimation of the mixed logit likelihood function by randomized quasi-Monte Carlo," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 305-320.
    10. Piergiacomo Sabino, 2011. "Implementing quasi-Monte Carlo simulations with linear transformations," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 51-74, April.
    11. Johannes O. Royset & Roberto Szechtman, 2013. "Optimal Budget Allocation for Sample Average Approximation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 762-776, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comgts:v:3:y:2006:i:1:p:55-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.