IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v12y2014i2p203-217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Evaluation of Using a Genetic Test to Direct Breast Cancer Chemoprevention in White Women with a Previous Breast Biopsy

Author

Listed:
  • Linda Green
  • Tuan Dinh
  • David Hinds
  • Bryan Walser
  • Richard Allman

Abstract

From the US payer’s perspective, the combined genetic and clinical risk assessment strategy may be a moderately cost-effective alternative to using clinical risk alone to guide chemoprevention recommendations for women at intermediate risk of developing breast cancer. Copyright Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Linda Green & Tuan Dinh & David Hinds & Bryan Walser & Richard Allman, 2014. "Economic Evaluation of Using a Genetic Test to Direct Breast Cancer Chemoprevention in White Women with a Previous Breast Biopsy," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 203-217, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:12:y:2014:i:2:p:203-217
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-014-0089-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s40258-014-0089-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-014-0089-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miriam Kasztura & Aude Richard & Nefti-Eboni Bempong & Dejan Loncar & Antoine Flahault, 2019. "Cost-effectiveness of precision medicine: a scoping review," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(9), pages 1261-1271, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:12:y:2014:i:2:p:203-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.