IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v10y2012i5p343-353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization Outcomes for Patients on Etanercept for Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Author

Listed:
  • Ronald Vender
  • Charles Lynde
  • Vincent Ho
  • Dina Chau
  • Melanie Poulin-Costello

Abstract

Background: Data investigating the effect of etanercept on work productivity and healthcare resource utilization in Canadian patients in a clinical setting is limited. Objective: The aim of the study was to describe work productivity and healthcare resource utilization in patients with psoriasis prescribed etanercept. Methods: A 12-month, phase IV, non-randomized, multicentre, open-label, single-arm prospective trial of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis was conducted between March 2006 and July 2009 in 37 community dermatology practice sites across Canada. A total of 246 patients were enrolled. Major eligibility criteria: ≥18 years of age; diagnosis of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis at baseline (Physician Global Assessment [PGA] ≥3, scale 0–5); able to start etanercept therapy as per product monograph. Patients received etanercept (Enbrel®) 50 mg subcutaneously twice weekly for 3 months, then 50 mg once weekly for 9 months. Outcomes were measured by average change and average percent change from baseline at months 3, 6, 9 and 12 on the Work Productivity and Activity Im-pairment (WPAI) and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU) questionnaires. Results: The mean degree of impairment while working ± standard deviation (SD) in the total population decreased from 22.7% ±23.2 at baseline to 6.6% ±14 after 3 months of treatment (p > 0.0001). From baseline to 3 months, overall work impairment± SD decreased from 23.7%±23.7 to 8.3%±16.5 (p > 0.0001) and mean activity impairment outside the workplace decreased from 31.4%±26.4 to 12.9%±22.4 (p>0.0001). All these improvements were sustained to month 12. Other variables that decreased on average from baseline to month 3, sustained to month 12, included physician office visits (2.3/month±3.5 at baseline to 0.6/month± 1.0 at month 3; p>0.0002), hours of assistance required of family and friends to assist with psoriasis (1.1 hours/week ±2.6 at baseline to 0.3 hours/week ± 1.5 at month 3; p=0.0002) and amount of time spent on activities to manage psoriasis (5.5 hours/week±6.2 at baseline to 1.9 hours/week±3.7 at month 3; p>0.0001). Also, the amount of out-of-pocket expenses to manage psoriasis decreased from $Can94.9/month±331.6 at baseline to $Can35.7±69.1 at month 12 (p=0.0153). Conclusions: Use of etanercept in Canadian patients in a clinical practice setting correlated with improvement in work productivity and reduced HRU after 3 months of treatment, and improvement was sustained up to 12 months. Copyright Springer International Publishing AG 2012

Suggested Citation

  • Ronald Vender & Charles Lynde & Vincent Ho & Dina Chau & Melanie Poulin-Costello, 2012. "Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization Outcomes for Patients on Etanercept for Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 10(5), pages 343-353, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:10:y:2012:i:5:p:343-353
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03261868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF03261868
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03261868?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:10:y:2012:i:5:p:343-353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.