IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/shc/jaresh/v1y2009i2p141-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To Indentify Performance Measurement Priorities And Associated Decision-Making Scenarios In The Sme

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Lynch
  • Cathal Wilson

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to outline a framework, whereby academic and small to medium sized enterprise owner-managers can interact and learn more from each other in an environment of mutual collaboration. This paper outlines a methodology, which identifies a set of critical performance measures, common to SMEs, and thus allows the marcheting function to be put in context within thr owerall organisational priorities.Decision-making scenarios, it can be argued are the only practical means by which one can influence or achieve a performance measure target. The outlined methodology olso identifies the decision scenarios, which are significant to each of these critical performance measures and their relative impact on marketing performance measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Lynch & Cathal Wilson, 2009. "To Indentify Performance Measurement Priorities And Associated Decision-Making Scenarios In The Sme," Journal of Academic Research in Economics, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Accounting and Financial Management Constanta, vol. 1(2 (Octobe), pages 141-154.
    • Handle: RePEc:shc:jaresh:v:1:y:2009:i:2:p:141-154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jare-sh.com/downloads/abstract_october_2009/abstract_lynch.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Methodology; Smal and Medium Enterprise (SME); Performance Measures; Decision-making scenarios; Marketing Priority;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:shc:jaresh:v:1:y:2009:i:2:p:141-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Chiru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fcuspro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.