IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sen/journl/v5i3y2004p263-276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ERG common position on remedies under the new regulatory framework for electronic communications: An economist's perspective

Author

Listed:
  • L. Di Mauro

Abstract

The recently published ERG Common Position on remedies under the new regulatory framework for electronic communications has been received by many observers and industry actors as a very intricate and at times impenetrable document. However, while clearly being very dense, it is a particularly important contribution to the evolution of the new framework, as well as of regulatory policy in general. This is true not only because it provides a common reference tool for regulators, but also because, by drawing at the same time on their experience and on economic analysis, it builds a much needed bridge between the two. This paper offers an interpretation of the main concepts behind the document and attempts to clarify the reasons why it can be of great support in the process of harmonising regulatory intervention across the EU.

Suggested Citation

  • L. Di Mauro, 2004. "The ERG common position on remedies under the new regulatory framework for electronic communications: An economist's perspective," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Intersentia, vol. 5(3), pages 263-276, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sen:journl:v:5:i:3:y:2004:p:263-276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sen:journl:v:5:i:3:y:2004:p:263-276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Petra Van den Bempt (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.crninet.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.