IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sen/journl/v4i4y2003p391-411.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unintended and persistent consequences of regulation: The case of cable television provision in Canada

Author

Listed:
  • S.M. Law
  • J.F. Nolan

Abstract

Economic regulation can have unintended consequences that are detrimental to subsequent policy change if the regulatory regime has institutionalized certain aspects of firm behaviour. For example, in a post-deregulation environment, unforeseen scalerelated phenomenon may persist in an industry that was formerly regulated according to firm size. Unfortunately, in many industries such effects can be difficult to identify. We examine measures of efficient scale for annual cross-sectional data from the cable television industry in Canada from 1992-1996, a time when the industry was being partially deregulated. Due to sample size problems among some of the size categories of interest, we estimate efficient scale in the industry using both a translog cost function and a non-parametric efficiency estimation method. We find that well after partial deregulation, the points of efficient scale in the industry can still be found at those size categories specified in the repealed rules. We label this phenomenon “regulatory persistence†and offer an explanation specific to this industry: the technology of cable television provision encouraged optimal firm sizes corresponding to the size categories found in the regulatory regime. These findings are further evidence of the existence of complex incentive structures between firms and regulators in the cable television industry

Suggested Citation

  • S.M. Law & J.F. Nolan, 2003. "Unintended and persistent consequences of regulation: The case of cable television provision in Canada," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Intersentia, vol. 4(4), pages 391-411, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sen:journl:v:4:i:4:y:2003:p:391-411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sen:journl:v:4:i:4:y:2003:p:391-411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Petra Van den Bempt (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.crninet.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.