IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sen/journl/v4i3y2003p227-270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EC merger control regulation and the energy sector: An analysis of the European Commission's decisional practice on remedies

Author

Listed:
  • M. Piergiovanni

Abstract

The purpose of the present paper is to assess the compatibility of the remedies negotiated between the European Commission and the merging parties in those concentrations concerning the energy sector, with the provisions and the objectives of the Merger Regulation, and, at the same time, to analyze the types and characteristics of such commitments in light of the principles of the Notice on Remedies .In the course of the paper it will be argued that the conditions and obligations attached to some of the Commission decisions in the energy sector should be considered illegitimate in light of the fact that the objective of such undertakings is not only, as it should be, to maintain and/or restore an effective competition on the market affected by the transaction, but also to positively regulate the structure of such market. It will be concluded that, not only in the energy sector, but as a general rule, the Commission should exercise its powers under the Merger Regulation in light of the exclusive objective of ensuring the competitive structure of the common market, while market regulation should be pursued through legislation, following the ad hoc procedures provided for by the EC Treaty.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Piergiovanni, 2003. "EC merger control regulation and the energy sector: An analysis of the European Commission's decisional practice on remedies," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Intersentia, vol. 4(3), pages 227-270, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sen:journl:v:4:i:3:y:2003:p:227-270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sen:journl:v:4:i:3:y:2003:p:227-270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Petra Van den Bempt (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.crninet.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.