Considerations On Interpretation Of Same Cases In Connection With Article 10 Of Patent Law No. 64/1991
AbstractInvention is subject to Patent Law no. 64/1991. As a result of his activity, if the conditions required by law, the inventor receives a patent. For like to create a technique to be declared invention it must meet following conditions: is new, is the result of an inventive step and have industrial application. In connection with first condition, we present some significant cases and reviews of rigor.. Failure patenting an invention of the author's fault is the main cause ignorance of Patent Low having bad track. .Situations analyzed represent colors look the same, namely, that the inventor need to patent his invention and only then you can to popularize by different means which have access.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration in its journal The Annals of the "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava. Fascicle of The Faculty of Economics and Public Administration.
Volume (Year): 10 (2010)
Issue (Month): 1(11) (June)
novelty; patent; priority; review; invention.;
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Liviu Scutariu).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.