IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sch/journl/v10y2008i2p256-273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resource Mobilisation and Utilisation by Panchayati Raj Institutions in UTs without Legislature

Author

Listed:
  • Jacob John

    (Kerala Development Society (KDS Delhi), New Delhi)

  • Ruchi Jain

    (NCDEX Institute of Commodity Markets and Research, New Delhi.)

Abstract

Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) in Union Territories (UTs) without a legislature have been grappling with many complex problems -- structural, administrative and fiscal. The Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Chandigarh, Daman and Diu, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Lakshadweep Islands are the five UTs in India that do not have a legislature. This paper examines the essential features of the PRI system in these UTs, analyses the mobilisation and utilisation of funds by PRIs and suggests concrete measures to improve their functioning. The study reveals that though the administrative bodies of all the five UTs have specified that functions be transferred to PRIs, this is not being executed. In the absence of a legislature, the UT administrator and the bureaucracy have been holding powers. A huge amount of funds available with PRIs remain unspent every year primarily due to the lack of functions and functionaries. Significantly, the accumulated unspent balance with the PRIs has had an adverse effect on mobilisation of own source of revenue. Certain concrete steps that are essential to improve fund mobilisation and utilisation by the PRI system in the five UTs are suggested. Own source of revenue needs to be mobilised by strengthening tax assessment and collection process. The study highlights the urgency for the removal of the mismatch between activity mapping and corresponding funding of PRIs under various budget heads of UTs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacob John & Ruchi Jain, 2008. "Resource Mobilisation and Utilisation by Panchayati Raj Institutions in UTs without Legislature," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore, vol. 10(2), pages 256-273, July-Dece.
  • Handle: RePEc:sch:journl:v:10:y:2008:i:2:p:256-273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.isec.ac.in/JSED_v10_i2_256-273.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sch:journl:v:10:y:2008:i:2:p:256-273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: B B Chand (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iseccin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.