Valuation Of Defaultable Claims – A Survey
AbstractThe literature on default-claim pricing falls into three categories. Building on the classical Merton model, the structural approach models the dynamics of the asset value and assumes that default is triggered when the equity value reaches an exogenous asset level. In a second class of structural models, the firm itself derives a default boundary endogenously. Finally, in the reduced-form approach default occurs according to an exogenous hazard rate process. In this paper I survey the default-claim literature. I provide a general valuation framework for default-claim pricing. I then give an example designed to clarify the main difference between the structural and the reduced-form approach. For each model category I show how current pricing models fit into my general framework, describe the applicable papers in some detail, and discuss related extensions.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by LMU Munich School of Management in its journal Schmalenbach Business Review.
Volume (Year): 54 (2002)
Issue (Month): 1 (January)
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- G13 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Winsen, Joseph K., 2010. "An overview of project finance binomial loan valuation," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 84-89, April.
- Gündüz, Yalin & Uhrig-Homburg, Marliese, 2011.
"Does modeling framework matter? A comparative study of structural and reduced-form models,"
Discussion Paper Series 2: Banking and Financial Studies
2011,05, Deutsche Bundesbank, Research Centre.
- Yalin Gündüz & Marliese Uhrig-Homburg, 2014. "Does modeling framework matter? A comparative study of structural and reduced-form models," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 39-78, April.
- Albrecht, Peter, 2005. "Kreditrisiken - Modellierung und Management: Ein Überblick," German Risk and Insurance Review (GRIR), University of Cologne, Department of Risk Management and Insurance, vol. 1(2), pages 22-152.
- Maclachlan, Iain C, 2007. "An empirical study of corporate bond pricing with unobserved capital structure dynamics," MPRA Paper 28416, University Library of Munich, Germany.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (sbr) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask sbr to update the entry or send us the correct address.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.