IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v25y2011i2p218-233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the impact of Union Learning Representatives on training: evidence from a matched sample of ULRs and managers

Author

Listed:
  • Kim Hoque

    (Birkbeck, University of London, UKÂ Â k.hoque@bbk.ac.uk)

  • Nicolas Bacon

    (University of Nottingham, UKÂ)

Abstract

Drawing on a matched sample of pairs of Union Learning Representatives (ULRs) and managers in 90 workplaces, this article evaluates managers’ views of the impact of ULRs on training and compares these views with those of ULRs themselves. Although managers are less positive than are ULRs about the impact ULRs have had, a significant proportion of managers nevertheless state that ULRs have had a positive influence. The article also uses the matched data to assess the factors associated with ULR effectiveness. ULRs are more likely to have had an impact on training where managers support the ULR role, where there is a learning centre at the workplace, where negotiation over training takes place and where the ULR covers no more than 200 employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim Hoque & Nicolas Bacon, 2011. "Assessing the impact of Union Learning Representatives on training: evidence from a matched sample of ULRs and managers," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 25(2), pages 218-233, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:25:y:2011:i:2:p:218-233
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017011398889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017011398889
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017011398889?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sean Kennedy & Robert Drago & Judith Sloan & Mark Wooden, 1994. "The Effect of Trade Unions on the Provision of Training: Australian Evidence," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 565-580, December.
    2. Jason Heyes & Mark Stuart, 1998. "Bargaining for Skills: Trade Unions and Training at the Workplace," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 36(3), pages 459-467, September.
    3. Kim Hoque & Nicolas Bacon, 2008. "Trade Unions, Union Learning Representatives and Employer‐Provided Training in Britain," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 46(4), pages 702-731, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Bill & Cassell, Catherine, 2017. "Facilitative reforms, democratic accountability, social accounting and learning representative initiatives," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 24-37.
    2. Balsmeier, Benjamin, 2017. "Unions, collective relations laws and R&D investment in emerging and developing countries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 292-304.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jason Heyes & Helen Rainbird, 2011. "Bargaining for Training: Converging or Diverging Interests?," Chapters, in: Susan Hayter (ed.), The Role of Collective Bargaining in the Global Economy, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Kim Hoque & Nicolas Bacon, 2008. "Trade Unions, Union Learning Representatives and Employer‐Provided Training in Britain," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 46(4), pages 702-731, December.
    3. Steven McIntosh, 1999. "A Cross-Country Comparison of the Determinants of Vocational Training," CEP Discussion Papers dp0432, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    4. Emma Wallis & Mark Stuart & Ian Greenwood, 2005. "‘Learners of the workplace unite!’," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 19(2), pages 283-304, June.
    5. Lucia Mýtna Kureková & Noah Vangeel & Ilse Tobback & Ivana Studená & Miroslav Štefánik & Karolien Lenaerts, 2023. "The Role of Industrial Relations and Social Dialogue in Improving Adult Learning Outcomes and Equity," Research Reports 54, Central European Labour Studies Institute (CELSI).
    6. Helen Rainbird & Mark Stuart, 2011. "The state and the union learning agenda in Britain," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 25(2), pages 202-217, June.
    7. Alan Barrett & Séamus McGuinness & Martin O’Brien & Philip O’Connell, 2013. "Immigrants and Employer-provided Training," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 52-78, March.
    8. Francis Green & Stephen Machin & David Wilkinson, 1999. "Trade Unions and Training Practices in British Workplaces," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 52(2), pages 179-195, January.
    9. Carmen GARCÍA OLAVERRI & Emilio HUERTA, 2011. "Trade union influence in Spanish manufacturing firms," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 150(3-4), pages 279-296, December.
    10. Phil Toner, 2006. "Restructuring the Australian Construction Industry and Workforce: Implications for a Sustainable Labour Supply," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 17(1), pages 171-202, September.
    11. Ryan, Paul., 2003. "Lifelong learning : potential and constraints with special reference to policies in the United Kingdom and Europe," ILO Working Papers 994096163402676, International Labour Organization.
    12. Bratti, Massimiliano & Conti, Maurizio & Sulis, Giovanni, 2019. "Employment Protection and Firm-Provided Training: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from a Labour Market Reform," IZA Discussion Papers 12773, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Giuseppe Croce, 2005. "A model of training policies in an imperfectly competitive labour market," Working Papers in Public Economics 90, University of Rome La Sapienza, Department of Economics and Law.
    14. Erol, Serife & Ahlers, Elke & Schleicher, Sergej, 2021. "Betriebliche Weiterbildung als Handlungsfeld der Betriebsräte," WSI Policy Briefs 51, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    15. Robert Perrett & Miguel Martínez Lucio & Jo McBride & Steve Craig, 2012. "Trade Union Learning Strategies and Migrant Workers," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(3), pages 649-667, February.
    16. Chatterji, Monojit, 2008. "Training hold up and social labour markets," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 202-214, April.
    17. Francis Green & Alan Felstead & Duncan Gallie & Hande Inanc & Nick Jewson, 2016. "The Declining Volume of Workers’ Training in Britain," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 54(2), pages 422-448, June.
    18. repec:ilo:ilowps:409616 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Wen Wang & Jason Heyes & Roger Seifert, 2023. "Trade union influence on innovation in the British private sector: Direct and indirect paths," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 44(2), pages 604-627, May.
    20. Richard Saundry & Valerie Antcliff & Alison Hollinrake, 2017. "Union learning representatives in the UK: activity, impact and organization," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 31(2), pages 265-283, April.
    21. Fabio Berton & Anna Carreri & Francesco Devicienti & Andrea Ricci, 2023. "The collective voice of unions and workplace training in Italy: New insights from mixed methods," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 595-622, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:25:y:2011:i:2:p:218-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.