IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vision/v16y2012i3p153-162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Corporate Dividend Policy: A Tobit Model Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Monica Singhania

    (Monica Singhania (monica@fms.edu) is Associate Professor, Faculty of Management Studies (FMS), University of Delhi, Delhi, India. She is a Fellow Member (FCA) of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. She has been awarded Ph.D. in the area of corporate finance and taxation from the University of Delhi. She is the author of seven books on direct tax laws and has several research papers published in leading journals. She teaches management accounting, management control systems, project management and corporate taxation to MBA students at FMS.)

  • Akshay Gupta

    (Akshay Gupta (akshay.g11@fms.edu) belongs to the MBA Class of 2011, Faculty of Management Studies (FMS), University of Delhi, Delhi, India. He is also Bachelor of Engineering (with distinction and merit) from Delhi College of Engineering, University of Delhi. Prior to joining FMS, he has worked as Software Engineer with Cisco Systems and as an Intern with various organizations such as Mentor Graphics, Defense Research and Development Organization (DRDO) and Central Electronics Engineering Research Institute (CEERI). His interest lies in Quantitative Finance, Equity Research and Portfolio Management.)

Abstract

Dividend is the return that a shareholder gets from a company, out of its profits, on his shareholding. Equity investors receive returns in two forms—dividends and capital gains. The factors that drive dividend policy of a company have been topic of extensive research for a long time now with various, sometimes even conflicting, theories trying to find some pattern in the behaviour vis-à -vis dividend payouts. The objective of the article is to find the validity of the different views on determinants of dividend policy in India and empirically prove their significance using Tobit regression model. We develop framework based on major theories on corporate dividends available in literature so as to examine the determinants of dividends comprehensively. The firm-level panel data of National Stock Exchange (Nifty 50) companies from 1999–2000 to 2009–2010 is taken for this purpose. Accuracy and validity of the results is ensured using various diagnostic tests and test procedures to find the best-fit models. The findings suggest that firm’s size (market capitalization) and firm’s growth and investment opportunity are significant determinants of corporate dividend policy in India. The firm’s debt structure, profitability and experience are found to be not significant in the Indian scenario and in this way the results do negate some theories. The results of the study can be used by investors to take informed decision while deciding on investments based on dividend yield for Nifty 50 Index companies and to predict dividend yields in future using the significant determinants.

Suggested Citation

  • Monica Singhania & Akshay Gupta, 2012. "Determinants of Corporate Dividend Policy: A Tobit Model Approach," Vision, , vol. 16(3), pages 153-162, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:16:y:2012:i:3:p:153-162
    DOI: 10.1177/0972262912460152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972262912460152
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972262912460152?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eugene F. Fama & Kenneth R. French, 2001. "Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics Or Lower Propensity To Pay?," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 14(1), pages 67-79, March.
    2. Frankfurter, George M. & Wood, Bob Jr., 2002. "Dividend policy theories and their empirical tests," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 111-138.
    3. Myers, Stewart C. & Majluf, Nicholas S., 1984. "Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 187-221, June.
    4. Adaoglu, Cahit, 2000. "Instability in the dividend policy of the Istanbul Stock Exchange (ISE) corporations: evidence from an emerging market," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 1(3), pages 252-270, November.
    5. White, Halbert, 1980. "A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 48(4), pages 817-838, May.
    6. Kim, Byeong Soo & Maddala, G S, 1992. "Estimation and Specification Analysis of Models of Dividend Behavior Based on Censored Panel Data," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 111-124.
    7. Sanjay Deshmukh, 2003. "Dividend Initiations and Asymmetric Information: A Hazard Model," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 38(3), pages 351-368, August.
    8. Stewart C. Myers & Nicholas S. Majluf, 1984. "Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have InformationThat Investors Do Not Have," NBER Working Papers 1396, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Healy, Paul M. & Palepu, Krishna G., 1988. "Earnings information conveyed by dividend initiations and omissions," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 149-175, September.
    10. Glen, J.D. & Karmokolias, Y. & Miller, R.R. & Shah, S., 1995. "Devidend Policy and Behavior in Emerging Markets," Papers 26, World Bank - International Finance Corporation.
    11. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    12. DeAngelo, Harry & DeAngelo, Linda & Skinner, Douglas J, 1992. "Dividends and Losses," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 47(5), pages 1837-1863, December.
    13. Merton H. Miller & Franco Modigliani, 1961. "Dividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation of Shares," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 34, pages 411-411.
    14. Black, Fischer & Scholes, Myron, 1974. "The effects of dividend yield and dividend policy on common stock prices and returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 1-22, May.
    15. Michael S. Rozeff, 1982. "Growth, Beta And Agency Costs As Determinants Of Dividend Payout Ratios," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 5(3), pages 249-259, September.
    16. Jensen, Gerald R. & Solberg, Donald P. & Zorn, Thomas S., 1992. "Simultaneous Determination of Insider Ownership, Debt, and Dividend Policies," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(2), pages 247-263, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jasminder Kaur, 2019. "Firm’s Life Cycle Spurs the Dividend Payments: A Fallacy or an Actuality?," Paradigm, , vol. 23(1), pages 36-52, June.
    2. Darakhshan Younis & Attiya Yasmin Javid, 2014. "Market Imperfections and Dividend Policy Decisions of Manufacturing Sector of Pakistan," PIDE-Working Papers 2014:99, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    3. Lee, King Fuei, 2010. "Retail minority shareholders and corporate reputation as determinant of dividend policy in Australia," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 351-368, September.
    4. Seyed Alireza Athari, 2021. "The effects of institutional settings and risks on bank dividend policy in an emerging market: Evidence from Tobit model," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 4493-4515, July.
    5. Szilagyi, P.G., 2007. "Corporate governance and the agency costs of debt and outside equity," Other publications TiSEM 9520d40a-224f-43a8-9bf9-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Hussein Abedi Shamsabadi & Byung-Seong Min & Richard Chung, 2016. "Corporate governance and dividend strategy: lessons from Australia," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(5), pages 583-610, October.
    7. Thi Thai Ha Le & Xuan Hung Nguyen & Manh Dung Tran, 2019. "Determinants of Dividend Payout Policy in Emerging Markets: Evidence from the ASEAN Region," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(4), pages 531-546, April.
    8. Jabbouri, Imad, 2016. "Determinants of corporate dividend policy in emerging markets: Evidence from MENA stock markets," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 283-298.
    9. Schmid, Thomas & Ampenberger, Markus & Kaserer, Christoph & Achleitner, Ann-Kristin, 2010. "Controlling shareholders and payout policy: do founding families have a special 'taste for dividends'?," CEFS Working Paper Series 2010-01, Technische Universität München (TUM), Center for Entrepreneurial and Financial Studies (CEFS).
    10. Trojanowski, G., 2004. "Ownership structure as a mechanism of corporate governance," Other publications TiSEM 5dbc874d-d1d0-44a5-9717-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Mahboubeh Bahreini & Cahit Adaoglu, 2018. "Dividend payouts of travel and leisure companies in Western Europe," Tourism Economics, , vol. 24(7), pages 801-820, November.
    12. Nishant B. Labhane & Jitendra Mahakud, 2016. "Determinants of Dividend Policy of Indian Companies," Paradigm, , vol. 20(1), pages 36-55, June.
    13. Kent Baker, H. & Kilincarslan, Erhan, 2019. "Why companies do not pay cash dividends: The Turkish experience," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    14. Florackis, Chris & Kanas, Angelos & Kostakis, Alexandros, 2015. "Dividend policy, managerial ownership and debt financing: A non-parametric perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(3), pages 783-795.
    15. Frankfurter, George M. & Wood, Bob Jr., 2002. "Dividend policy theories and their empirical tests," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 111-138.
    16. Hung Ngoc Dang & Van Thi Thuy Vu & Xuan Thanh Ngo & Ha Thi Viet Hoang, 2021. "Impact of dividend policy on corporate value: Experiment in Vietnam," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 5815-5825, October.
    17. Okun O. Omokhudu & Ohidoa Toluwa, 2018. "Agency Cost and Dividend Policy in Nigerian NonFinancial Quoted Firms," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(4), pages 325-350, April.
    18. Amjad Hassonn & Huy Tran & Hao Quach, 2016. "The Determinants of Corporate Dividend Policy: Evidence from Palestine," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 5(4), pages 1-2.
    19. Nishant B. Labhane, 2019. "Dividend Policy Decisions in India: Standalone Versus Business Group-Affiliated Firms," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 20(1), pages 133-150, February.
    20. H.Kent Baker & Gary E. Powell & E.Theodore Veit, 2002. "Revisiting the dividend puzzle," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), pages 241-261.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:16:y:2012:i:3:p:153-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.