IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v35y2006i2p193-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subset Correspondence Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Greenacre

    (Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain)

  • Rafael Pardo

    (Fundacion BBVA, Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

This study shows how correspondence analysis may be applied to a subset of response categories from a questionnaire survey (e.g., the subset of undecided responses or the subset of responses for a particular category across several questions). The idea is to maintain the original relative frequencies of the categories and not reexpress them relative to totals within the subset, as would normally be done in a regular correspondence analysis of the subset. Furthermore, the masses and chi-square distances assigned to the subset of categories are the same as those in the correspondence analysis of the whole data set, which leads to a decomposition of total variance into parts if the whole data set is subdivided into disjoint subsets. This variant of the method, called subset correspondence analysis, is illustrated on data from the International Social Survey Programme’s Family and Changing Gender Roles survey.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Greenacre & Rafael Pardo, 2006. "Subset Correspondence Analysis," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 35(2), pages 193-218, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:35:y:2006:i:2:p:193-218
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124106290316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124106290316
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124106290316?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Aitchison & Michael Greenacre, 2002. "Biplots of compositional data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 51(4), pages 375-392, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Svetlana Zhuchkova & Aleksei Rotmistrov, 2022. "How to choose an approach to handling missing categorical data: (un)expected findings from a simulated statistical experiment," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Wenmei Yang & Adriano S. Koshiyama, 2019. "Assessing qualitative similarities between financial reporting frameworks using visualization and rules: COREP vs. pillar 3," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 16-31, January.
    3. Blasius, Jörg & Eilers, Paul H.C. & Gower, John, 2009. "Better biplots," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 3145-3158, June.
    4. Tor Korneliussen & Michael Greenacre, 2016. "Information sources used by European tourists: A cross-cultural study," Economics Working Papers 1527, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    5. Julie Josse & Marie Chavent & Benot Liquet & François Husson, 2012. "Handling Missing Values with Regularized Iterative Multiple Correspondence Analysis," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 29(1), pages 91-116, April.
    6. Michael Greenacre & Paul Lewi, 2009. "Distributional Equivalence and Subcompositional Coherence in the Analysis of Compositional Data, Contingency Tables and Ratio-Scale Measurements," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 26(1), pages 29-54, April.
    7. Takane, Yoshio & Jung, Sunho, 2009. "Regularized nonsymmetric correspondence analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 3159-3170, June.
    8. Michael Greenacre & Patrick J. F Groenen & Trevor Hastie & Alfonso Iodice d’Enza & Angelos Markos & Elena Tuzhilina, 2023. "Principal component analysis," Economics Working Papers 1856, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    9. Menconi, M.E. & Tasso, S. & Santinelli, M. & Grohmann, D., 2020. "A card game to renew urban parks: Face-to-face and online approach for the inclusive involvement of local community," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    10. Ganiere, Pierre & Chern, Wen S. & Hahn, David E., 2004. "Who Are Proponents And Opponents Of Genetically Modified Foods In The United States?," Working Papers 28315, Ohio State University, Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics.
    11. Josse, Julie & Husson, François, 2016. "missMDA: A Package for Handling Missing Values in Multivariate Data Analysis," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 70(i01).
    12. Ganiere, Pierre & Chern, Wen S. & Hahn, David E. & Chiang, Fu-Sung, 2004. "Consumer Attitudes towards Genetically Modified Foods in Emerging Markets: The Impact of Labeling in Taiwan," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 7(3), pages 1-20.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. B. Baris Alkan & Afsin Sahin, 2011. "Measuring inequalities in the distribution of health workers by bi-plot approach: The case of Turkey," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 2(2), pages 57-66.
    2. Michael Greenacre, 2016. "Selection and statistical analysis of compositional ratios," Economics Working Papers 1551, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    3. Giovanni C. Porzio & Giancarlo Ragozini & Domenico Vistocco, 2008. "On the use of archetypes as benchmarks," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5), pages 419-437, September.
    4. Javier Palarea-Albaladejo & Josep Martín-Fernández & Jesús Soto, 2012. "Dealing with Distances and Transformations for Fuzzy C-Means Clustering of Compositional Data," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 29(2), pages 144-169, July.
    5. Michael Greenacre & Paul Lewi, 2005. "Distributional equivalence and subcompositional coherence in the analysis of contingency tables, ratio-scale measurements and compositional data," Economics Working Papers 908, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Aug 2007.
    6. Anna Maria Fiori & Francesco Porro, 2023. "A compositional analysis of systemic risk in European financial institutions," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 325-354, September.
    7. Germ`a Coenders & N'uria Arimany Serrat, 2023. "Accounting statement analysis at industry level. A gentle introduction to the compositional approach," Papers 2305.16842, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    8. Juan José Egozcue & Vera Pawlowsky-Glahn, 2019. "Rejoinder on: Compositional data: the sample space and its structure," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 658-663, September.
    9. Marco Taussi & Caterina Gozzi & Orlando Vaselli & Jacopo Cabassi & Matia Menichini & Marco Doveri & Marco Romei & Alfredo Ferretti & Alma Gambioli & Barbara Nisi, 2022. "Contamination Assessment and Temporal Evolution of Nitrates in the Shallow Aquifer of the Metauro River Plain (Adriatic Sea, Italy) after Remediation Actions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-24, September.
    10. Siham Zaaboubi & Lotfi Khiari & Salah Abdesselam & Jacques Gallichand & Fassil Kebede & Ghouati Kerrache, 2020. "Particle Size Imbalance Index from Compositional Analysis to Evaluate Cereal Sustainability for Arid Soils in Eastern Algeria," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-10, July.
    11. Gardner-Lubbe, Sugnet, 2016. "A triplot for multiclass classification visualisation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 20-32.
    12. Greenacre, Michael, 2009. "Power transformations in correspondence analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 3107-3116, June.
    13. Michael Greenacre, 2009. "Contribution biplots," Economics Working Papers 1162, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Jan 2011.
    14. Michael Greenacre, 2023. "The chi-square standardization, combined with Box-Cox transformation, is a valid alternative to transforming to logratios in compositional data analysis," Economics Working Papers 1857, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    15. Huiwen Wang & Liying Shangguan & Rong Guan & Lynne Billard, 2015. "Principal component analysis for compositional data vectors," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1079-1096, December.
    16. Michael Greenacre, 2006. "Tying up the loose ends in simple correspondence analysis," Economics Working Papers 940, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    17. repec:jss:jstsof:13:i05 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Jan Skála & Radim Vácha & Pavel Čupr, 2018. "Which Compounds Contribute Most to Elevated Soil Pollution and the Corresponding Health Risks in Floodplains in the Headwater Areas of the Central European Watershed?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, June.
    19. Maria Anna Di Palma & Michele Gallo, 2019. "External Information Model in a Compositional Perspective: Evaluation of Campania Adolescents’ Preferences in the Allocation of Leisure-Time," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 117-133, November.
    20. Cuadras, Carles M. & Greenacre, Michael, 2022. "A short history of statistical association: From correlation to correspondence analysis to copulas," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    21. Michael Greenacre & Eric Grunsky, 2019. "The isometric logratio transformation in compositional data analysis: a practical evaluation," Economics Working Papers 1627, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:35:y:2006:i:2:p:193-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.