IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pubfin/v10y1982i3p355-368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-Fisc Distributions of Income: Measuring Progressivity With Application To the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Edward C. Kienzle

    (Stonehill College)

Abstract

Building upon recent research designed to measure the progressivity of the pub-lic budget, this article contributes a mathematical and computational method for measuring the progressivity of public expenditures and net fiscal incidence (NFI), and derives the mathematical relationship among the NFI progressivity index, the tax progressivity index, and the public expenditure progressivity index. The computational methodology is utilized in a fiscal application to United States data. The results indicate that from 1950 to 1970 the movement toward increased progressivity in the federal expenditure structure was dominated by the combination of the movement toward less progressivity in the state and local expenditure structure, less progressivity in the federal tax structure, and more regressivity in the state and local tax structure. It is shown that from 1950 to 1970 NFI progressivity decreased for all three government levels studied.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward C. Kienzle, 1982. "Post-Fisc Distributions of Income: Measuring Progressivity With Application To the United States," Public Finance Review, , vol. 10(3), pages 355-368, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:10:y:1982:i:3:p:355-368
    DOI: 10.1177/109114218201000304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/109114218201000304
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/109114218201000304?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suits, Daniel B, 1980. "Measurement of Tax Progressivity: Reply," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(1), pages 211-211, March.
    2. Davies, David G, 1980. "Measurement of Tax Progressivity: Comment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(1), pages 204-207, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Selden, Thomas M. & Wasylenko, Michael J., 1992. "Benefit incidence analysis in developing countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1015, The World Bank.
    2. Poddar, Satya N. & Genser, Bernd, 1986. "Measurement of effective tax progression," Discussion Papers, Series I 224, University of Konstanz, Department of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Poddar, Satya N. & Genser, Bernd, 1986. "Measurement of effective tax progression," Discussion Papers, Series I 224, University of Konstanz, Department of Economics.
    2. John Bishop & K. Chow & John Formby & Chih-Chin Ho, 1997. "Did Tax Reform Reduce Actual US Progressivity? Evidence from the Taxpayer Compliance Measurement Program," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 4(2), pages 177-197, May.
    3. Steven M. Rock, 1983. "Measurement of Tax Progressivity: Application," Public Finance Review, , vol. 11(1), pages 109-120, January.
    4. Liu Baihui, 2017. "Redistributive Effect of Taxes and Transfers: Evidence from China," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 3(1), pages 43-51.
    5. Sarte, Pierre-Daniel G., 1997. "Progressive taxation and income inequality in dynamic competitive equilibrium," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 145-171, October.
    6. John P. Formby & W. James Smith & Paul D. Thistle, 1990. "The Average Tax Burden and the Welfare Implications of Global Tax Progressivity," Public Finance Review, , vol. 18(1), pages 3-24, January.
    7. Lung-Fai Wong & Joel Michael & Doug Wilson, 1990. "The Distributive Effect of Expanding the Sales Tax," Public Finance Review, , vol. 18(4), pages 465-479, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:10:y:1982:i:3:p:355-368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.