IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/prodev/v10y2010i1p35-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The concept of poverty

Author

Listed:
  • Federica Misturelli

    (Livestock Development Group, University of Reading)

  • Claire Heffernan

    (Livestock Development Group, University of Reading)

Abstract

Poverty is often presented as an evolving concept linked to dominant development paradigms. However, changes in the meaning of specific topics comprising definitions of poverty have been largely overlooked. Therefore, the authors adopted a synchronic approach to evaluate changes contained within 159 definitions of poverty offered over a 30-year period from 1970s to 2000s. Component terms were investigated for their stability in meaning, through the application of De Saussure’s concepts of signifier and signified. The results illustrate that terms often did not share the same signifier and, therefore, were accorded different meanings. In this manner, the authors argue that poverty is a highly contested concept

Suggested Citation

  • Federica Misturelli & Claire Heffernan, 2010. "The concept of poverty," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 10(1), pages 35-58, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:10:y:2010:i:1:p:35-58
    DOI: 10.1177/146499340901000103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/146499340901000103
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/146499340901000103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aidan Cox & John Healey & Paul Hoebink & Timo Voipio, 2000. "European Development Cooperation and the Poor," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-333-98317-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sandra Contzen, 2015. "«Wir sind nicht arm»! Diskursive Konstruktionen von Armut von Schweizer Bauernfamilien," Journal of Socio-Economics in Agriculture (Until 2015: Yearbook of Socioeconomics in Agriculture), Swiss Society for Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, vol. 8(1), pages 60-69.
    2. Sara Mota Cardoso & Aurora A. C. Teixeira, 2020. "The Focus on Poverty in the Most Influential Journals in Economics: A Bibliometric Analysis of the “Blue Ribbon” Journals," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 10-42, March.
    3. Ali Madanipour & Mark Shucksmith & Hilary Talbot, 2015. "Concepts of poverty and social exclusion in Europe," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 30(7), pages 721-741, November.
    4. Uno Ijim Agbor, 2016. "The State, Academia and Poverty: Towards a Schema for Effective Poverty Reduction in Nigeria," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 6(7), pages 16-30, July.
    5. Argatu Ruxandra, 2018. "Analysis of social models in Central and Eastern Europe - A focus on poverty and social exclusion," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 80-92, May.
    6. Hummera Saleem & Malik Shahzad Shabbir & Bilal Khan, 2021. "Re-examining Multidimensional Poverty in Pakistan: A New Assessment of Regional Variations," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 22(6), pages 1441-1458, December.
    7. Sanjay K Mohanty & Golam Rasul & Bidhubhusan Mahapatra & Dhrupad Choudhury & Sabarnee Tuladhar & E. Valdemar Holmgren, 2018. "Multidimensional Poverty in Mountainous Regions: Shan and Chin in Myanmar," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 138(1), pages 23-44, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:10:y:2010:i:1:p:35-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.