IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pophec/v11y2012i2p171-185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life is not a camping trip – on the desirability of Cohenite socialism

Author

Listed:
  • Miriam Ronzoni

    (University of Frankfurt, Germany)

Abstract

In Why Not Socialism?, GA Cohen defines socialism as the combined application of two moral principles: the egalitarian principle and the principle of community. The desirability of a social order organized around these two principles is illustrated by the ‘camping trip’ example. After describing the fundamental features of the camping trip scenario at reasonable length, Cohen argues that the desirability of such a social model is nearly self-explanatory, concluding therefore that the most significant challenges to socialism lie in its feasibility. This article argues that the desirability of the camping trip model as an appropriate ideal for society is less obvious than Cohen acknowledges. To argue my point, I shall compare the camping trip with another social practice that is equally small sized and characterized by strong emotional ties among its members, but in which the conditions of what I shall call ‘goal-monism’ and discontinuity in time do not hold, namely, the family.

Suggested Citation

  • Miriam Ronzoni, 2012. "Life is not a camping trip – on the desirability of Cohenite socialism," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 11(2), pages 171-185, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:11:y:2012:i:2:p:171-185
    DOI: 10.1177/1470594X11417239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470594X11417239
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1470594X11417239?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:11:y:2012:i:2:p:171-185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.