The problem of letting go: The â€˜Big Societyâ€™, accountable governance and â€˜the curse of the decentralizing ministerâ€™
AbstractWhile clear lines of accountability are normally considered a sine qua non of any modern democracy, this article argues that too much accountability can be as problematic as too little. Through the application of a number of analytical â€˜hooksâ€™ drawn from the accountability studies literature, it argues that if the coalition governmentâ€™s rhetorical commitment to a shift from a â€˜Big Stateâ€™ to a â€˜Big Societyâ€™ is implemented, it may well flounder due to its inability to reconcile the centrifugal forces of devolution and localism with the centripetal forces of political accountability and public expectation. Indeed, without a more aggressive, sophisticated and indeed honest approach to accountability, the â€˜Big Societyâ€™ is unwittingly likely to forge an even â€˜Bigger Stateâ€™.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by London South Bank University in its journal Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit.
Volume (Year): 26 (2011)
Issue (Month): 8 (December)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml
accountability; â€˜Big Societyâ€™; governance; ministerial responsibility; responsibility;
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publications).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.