IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joupea/v50y2013i3p385-400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fresh carnations or all thorn, no rose? Nonviolent campaigns and transitions in autocracies

Author

Listed:
  • Mauricio Rivera Celestino

    (Department of Government, University of Essex)

  • Kristian Skrede Gleditsch

    (Department of Government, University of Essex & Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO))

Abstract

Whereas optimists see the so-called Arab Spring as similar to the revolutions of 1989, and likely to bring about democratic rule, skeptics fear that protest bringing down dictators may simply give way to new dictatorships, as in the Iranian revolution. Existing research on transitions has largely neglected the role of protest and direct action in destabilizing autocracies and promoting democracy. We argue that protest and direct action can promote transitions in autocracies, and that the mode of direct action, that is, whether violent or nonviolent, has a major impact on the prospects for autocratic survival and democracy. We present empirical results supporting our claim that nonviolent protests substantially increase the likelihood of transitions to democracy, especially under favorable international environments, while violent direct action is less effective in undermining autocracies overall, and makes transitions to new autocracies relatively more likely.

Suggested Citation

  • Mauricio Rivera Celestino & Kristian Skrede Gleditsch, 2013. "Fresh carnations or all thorn, no rose? Nonviolent campaigns and transitions in autocracies," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 50(3), pages 385-400, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:50:y:2013:i:3:p:385-400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/50/3/385.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:50:y:2013:i:3:p:385-400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.prio.no/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.