Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Courts as Coordinators

Contents:

Author Info

  • Leslie Johns

    ()
    (Department of Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Why do states build international courts, submit cases, and enforce court judgments? This article examines the role of a court that is neither a “decider†nor an “information provider.†Litigation is costly and does not reveal private information. The court’s ruling is not binding and bargaining can occur before and after the court has ruled. Nevertheless, an alternative dispute resolution mechanism emerges: court rulings can coordinate endogenous multilateral enforcement. Disinterested states will enforce to ensure that they can profitably use the court in the future. Accepting jurisdiction of the court allows a state to make efficiency-enhancing “trades,†winning high-value disputes in exchange for losing low-value disputes. This is possible because litigation is a screening device: states only sue when they derive relatively high value from the disputed asset. The use of the court as a coordination device for multilateral enforcement allows for the existence of a court with endogenous enforcement and jurisdiction.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://jcr.sagepub.com/content/56/2/257.abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Peace Science Society (International) in its journal Journal of Conflict Resolution.

    Volume (Year): 56 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 2 (April)
    Pages: 257-289

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:56:y:2012:i:2:p:257-289

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://pss.la.psu.edu/

    Related research

    Keywords: international courts; international law; enforcement; jurisdiction; self-enforcing institutions;

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:56:y:2012:i:2:p:257-289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publications).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.