IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v56y2012i1p94-117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Split? Organizational Splits among Ethnopolitical Organizations in the Middle East

Author

Listed:
  • Victor Asal
  • Mitchell Brown
  • Angela Dalton

Abstract

Why do political organizations split? Drawing insight from organizational theory and social movement literature, this article explores the effect of organizational factors on group schism. Using a new data set of 112 ethnopolitical organizations in the Middle East, the article examines to what extent organizational factors such as leadership structure, organizational legality, and tactical intensity, as well as contextual variables such as state violence and external support for the organization, influence group schism. Findings show that organizations with a factional or competing leadership structure and those that use violence as a tactic are at a greater risk to split. Contrary to research on political parties, which highlight the importance of factional leadership structure in relation to the maintenance and growth of the party organization, findings suggest that competing leadership structure, along with the employment of tactical violence, precipitates ethnopolitical organizational fission and eventual splintering.

Suggested Citation

  • Victor Asal & Mitchell Brown & Angela Dalton, 2012. "Why Split? Organizational Splits among Ethnopolitical Organizations in the Middle East," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 56(1), pages 94-117, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:56:y:2012:i:1:p:94-117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jcr.sagepub.com/content/56/1/94.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:56:y:2012:i:1:p:94-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.