IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/inrsre/v35y2012i4p367-388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Multipliers from Survey and Non-Survey Based IO Models

Author

Listed:
  • Natalie Stoeckl

Abstract

This article compares ninety different multiplier estimates derived from non-survey Input–Output (IO) tables with those derived from a novel survey approach. It finds that, on average, the estimates are surprisingly similar, indicating that the survey-based approach may be a cost-effective technique for generating multiplier estimates. Where differences do exist, it finds that differences in production technologies are a more important source of differences in multipliers than are differences in import propensities. This suggests that those who regionalize national IO tables may not just need to allow for differences in the propensity of sectors to import; they may also need to allow for differences in production technologies—particularly if regionalizing IO tables that have been developed in relatively urban areas for use in rural or remote locales such as those considered here.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalie Stoeckl, 2012. "Comparing Multipliers from Survey and Non-Survey Based IO Models," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 35(4), pages 367-388, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:35:y:2012:i:4:p:367-388
    DOI: 10.1177/0160017610385452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0160017610385452
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0160017610385452?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bandias, Susan & Ram Vemuri, Siva, 0. "Telecommunications infrastructure facilitating sustainable development of rural and remote communities in Northern Australia," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2-3), pages 237-249, March.
    2. John R. Roy, 2004. "Regional input-output analysis, data and uncertainty," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 38(3), pages 397-412, September.
    3. Timo Tohmo, 2004. "New Developments in the Use of Location Quotients to Estimate Regional Input-Output Coefficients and Multipliers," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 43-54.
    4. Donald Gilchrist & Larry V. ST Louis, 1999. "Completing Input-Output Tables using Partial Information, with an Application to Canadian Data," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 185-194.
    5. Philip Mccann & John H. LL. Dewhurst, 1998. "Regional Size, Industrial Location and Input-Output Expenditure Coefficients," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(5), pages 435-444.
    6. A. T. Flegg & C. D. Webber, 2000. "Regional Size, Regional Specialization and the FLQ Formula," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 563-569.
    7. Natalie Stoeckl, 2007. "Using Surveys of Business Expenditure to Draw Inferences about the Size of Regional Multipliers: A Case-study of Tourism in Northern Australia," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(7), pages 917-931.
    8. Erik Dietzenbacher & Ronald E. Miller, 2009. "Ras‐Ing The Transactions Or The Coefficients: It Makes No Difference," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 555-566, August.
    9. Andrea Bonfiglio & Francesco Chelli, 2008. "Assessing the Behaviour of Non-Survey Methods for Constructing Regional Input-Output Tables through a Monte Carlo Simulation," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 243-258.
    10. Randall Jackson, 1998. "Regionalizing National Commodity-by-Industry Accounts," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 223-238.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oriane Lafuente-Sampietro, 2021. "The multiplier effect of convertible local currencies : case study on two French schemes," Working Papers halshs-03324625, HAL.
    2. Natalie Stoeckl & Michelle Esparon & Marina Farr & Aurélie Delisle & Owen Stanley, 2014. "The great asymmetric divide: An empirical investigation of the link between indigenous and non-indigenous economic systems in Northern Australia," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(4), pages 783-801, November.
    3. Kristinn Hermannsson, 2016. "Beyond Intermediates: The Role of Consumption and Commuting in the Construction of Local Input–Output Tables," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 315-339, July.
    4. Jim McFarlane & Bligh Grant & Boyd Blackwell & Stuart Mounter, 2017. "Combining amenity with experience," Tourism Economics, , vol. 23(5), pages 1076-1095, August.
    5. Karyn Morrissey, 2016. "A location quotient approach to producing regional production multipliers for the Irish economy," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(3), pages 491-506, August.
    6. Georgios Lampiris & Christos Karelakis & Efstratios Loizou, 2020. "Comparison of non-survey techniques for constructing regional input–output tables," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 225-266, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gunnar Lindberg, 2011. "On the appropriate use of (input-output) coefficients to generate non-survey regional input-output tables: Implications for the determination of output multipliers," ERSA conference papers ersa10p800, European Regional Science Association.
    2. Szabó, Norbert, 2015. "Methods for regionalizing input-output tables," MPRA Paper 73947, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Anthony T. Flegg & Leonardo J. Mastronardi & Carlos A. Romero, 2016. "Evaluating the FLQ and AFLQ formulae for estimating regional input coefficients: empirical evidence for the province of Córdoba, Argentina," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 21-37, March.
    4. Anthony T. Flegg & Yongming Huang & Timo Tohmo, 2015. "Using Charm to Adjust for Cross-Hauling: The Case of the Province of Hubei, China," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 391-413, September.
    5. Georgios Lampiris & Christos Karelakis & Efstratios Loizou, 2020. "Comparison of non-survey techniques for constructing regional input–output tables," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 225-266, November.
    6. Anthony Flegg & Timo Tohmo, 2011. "Regional Input-Output Tables and the FLQ Formula: A Case Study of Finland," ERSA conference papers ersa11p334, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Kristinn Hermannsson, 2016. "Beyond Intermediates: The Role of Consumption and Commuting in the Construction of Local Input–Output Tables," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 315-339, July.
    8. Anthony T. Flegg & Yongming Huang & Timo Tohmo, 2015. "Using CHARM to adjust for cross-hauling: the case of the Province of Hubei, China," Working Papers 20151506, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    9. Johannes Többen & Tobias Heinrich Kronenberg, 2015. "Construction Of Multi-Regional Input--Output Tables Using The Charm Method," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 487-507, December.
    10. Lankhuizen, Maureen & Boonstra, Harm Jan & de Blois, Chris, 2020. "Unpacking freight – Identifying conditions driving regional freight transport in statistics," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 415-435.
    11. Cristian Mardones & Darling Silva, 2023. "Evaluation of Non-survey Methods for the Construction of Regional Input–Output Matrices When There is Partial Historical Information," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 1173-1205, March.
    12. Tobias Kronenberg, 2012. "Regional input-output models and the treatment of imports in the European System of Accounts (ESA)," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 32(2), pages 175-191, September.
    13. Kronenberg, Tobias, 2011. "Regional input-output models and the treatment of imports in the European System of Accounts," MPRA Paper 30797, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Andrea BONFIGLIO, 2008. "Evaluating Implications of Agricultural Policies in a Rural Region through a CGE Analysis," Working Papers 328, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    15. Kowalewski Julia, 2013. "Inter-industrial Relations and Sectoral Employment Development in German Regions," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 233(4), pages 486-504, August.
    16. Kronenberg, Tobias & Többen, Johannes, 2011. "Regional input-output modelling in Germany: The case of North Rhine-Westphalia," MPRA Paper 35494, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Umed Temursho & Manuel Alejandro Cardenete & Krzysztof Wojtowicz & Luis Rey & Matthias Weitzel & Toon Vandyck & Bert Saveyn, 2020. "Projecting input-output tables for model baselines," JRC Research Reports JRC120513, Joint Research Centre.
    18. Cristian Mardones & Darling Silva, 2021. "Estimation of regional input coefficients and output multipliers for the regions of Chile," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(4), pages 875-889, August.
    19. Andrea Bonfiglio & Francesco Chelli, 2008. "Assessing the Behaviour of Non-Survey Methods for Constructing Regional Input-Output Tables through a Monte Carlo Simulation," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 243-258.
    20. Anthony T. Flegg & Leonardo J. Mastronardi & Carlos A. Romero, 2014. "Empirical evidence on the use of the FLQ formula for regionalizing national input-output tables: The case of the Province of C¨®rdoba, Argentina," Working Papers 20141406, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:35:y:2012:i:4:p:367-388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.