IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indeco/v49y2012i3p295-320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Something like rights? Faith, law and widow immolation debates in colonial Bengal

Author

Listed:
  • Tanika Sarkar

Abstract

The article straddles two separate but intertwined registers. One is the interface between faith and law under early colonial rule. I explore this through the lens of colonial governance of immolations of Hindu widows. The other is the gradual transmutation of an idea or a word: consent, the widow’s consent to burning alive. The early colonial state formally institutionalised the widow’s consent as the basis for all lawful immolations. That, I argue, eventuated, over a long stretch of time, and through a strangely twisted dialectic, in a horizon of female entitlements and immunities. Controversially but recognisably, she became the bearer of something like rights rather than of sacred prescriptions and injunctions alone. This was a development that neither the state nor its Brahman ritual specialists had actually intended.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanika Sarkar, 2012. "Something like rights? Faith, law and widow immolation debates in colonial Bengal," The Indian Economic & Social History Review, , vol. 49(3), pages 295-320, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:indeco:v:49:y:2012:i:3:p:295-320
    DOI: 10.1177/0019464612455276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0019464612455276
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0019464612455276?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indeco:v:49:y:2012:i:3:p:295-320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.