IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/fortra/v48y2013i1p105-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relations between the TRIPS Agreement and the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement: A Plurilateral Instrument Having Multilateral Functions with Little Multilateral Process

Author

Listed:
  • Chang-fa Lo

Abstract

The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement was negotiated among developed and some more advanced developing countries to enhance the enforcement aspects of intellectual property rights protection. The main purpose of it was to raise the international standards of enforcement through establishing a plurilateral agreement. The agreement has its multilateral functions partly because of the nature of the agreement and partly because of the MFN obligations under the TRIPS Agreement. For non-Parties, the intellectual property rights of their nationals are to be protected by the agreement because of the MFN obligations under the TRIPS Agreement. Although this is theoretically beneficial to non-Parties, they are not to receive substantial benefits mainly because non-Parties are mostly not the major origins of intellectual property right holders. However, the agreement is to adversely affect the products or services coming from all WTO Members, whether or not they are the Parties. Developing countries producing products (such as generic drugs) and those in need of such products could be adversely affected by such higher standards. Since the agreement has such multilateral functions and since there is a lack of multilateral process in the enactment of this plurilateral agreement, there is a need to cope with the problem. The paper proposes some steps to be taken by the Parties to reduce the concerns of such multilateral function so that it will be more compatible with multilateral system. The steps include the establishment of regular consultation mechanism with non-Parties, the publishing of information concerning the implementation of the agreement to reflect whether there is a genuine manner of carrying out the higher standards of enforcement and the proper terms to be drafted in favour of developing country members of the WTO to attract more non-Parties to join the agreement and to reduce the gap between the plurilateral agreement and the multilateral system.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang-fa Lo, 2013. "Relations between the TRIPS Agreement and the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement: A Plurilateral Instrument Having Multilateral Functions with Little Multilateral Process," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 48(1), pages 105-124, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:fortra:v:48:y:2013:i:1:p:105-124
    DOI: 10.1177/001573251204800105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001573251204800105
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/001573251204800105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA); plurilateral agreement; TRIPS Agreement; TRIPS-plus.; F53;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F53 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Agreements and Observance; International Organizations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:fortra:v:48:y:2013:i:1:p:105-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.