IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eeupol/v12y2011i2p147-167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Buying support and regime change: the evolution of Polish attitudes towards the EU and voting between accession and 2008

Author

Listed:
  • John E. Jackson

    (University of Michigan, USA, jjacksn@umich.edu)

  • Bogdan W. Mach

    (Polish Academy of Science, Poland)

  • Jennifer L. Miller-Gonzalez

    (University of Michigan, USA)

Abstract

Positive assessments of what entry to the European Union (EU) meant for Poland and for Poles increased after the 2003 vote to join and dramatically so after accession. Analysis of panel data from 2003 and 2008 shows the increase in positive assessments is related to the size of EU transfers and to increases in personal income, particularly for assessments of personal benefits. The attitude changes are also related to variables associated with individuals mostly likely to benefit from greater access to the larger Europe. The positive EU attitudes on both dimensions are related to votes for the pro-EU party that came into office in the 2007 election. In this way, the benefits from entry ‘bought’ more favorable attitudes and a more favorable government for the EU.

Suggested Citation

  • John E. Jackson & Bogdan W. Mach & Jennifer L. Miller-Gonzalez, 2011. "Buying support and regime change: the evolution of Polish attitudes towards the EU and voting between accession and 2008," European Union Politics, , vol. 12(2), pages 147-167, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:12:y:2011:i:2:p:147-167
    DOI: 10.1177/1465116511400197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1465116511400197
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1465116511400197?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liesbet Hooghe, 2007. "What Drives Euroskepticism?," European Union Politics, , vol. 8(1), pages 5-12, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Monika Banaszewska & Ivo Bischoff, 2018. "Grants-in-aid and the prospect of re-election: The impact of EU funds on mayoral elections in Poland," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201822, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iuliana-Lacramioara TINCU, 2017. "Public Support For The European Union In The Current Context: Preliminary Remarks," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 2, pages 155-159, December.
    2. Brian Burgoon, 2013. "Inequality and anti-globalization backlash by political parties," European Union Politics, , vol. 14(3), pages 408-435, September.
    3. Marino De Luca, 2022. "Methods for analysing citizens’ attitudes: a hypothetical Italian referendum about the membership of the European Union as a case study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1681-1699, June.
    4. Eric Kaufmann, 2022. "The new culture wars: Why critical race theory matters more than cancel culture," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(4), pages 773-788, July.
    5. Štěpán Strnad, 2013. "Crisis of the European Union Legitimacy - No European Demos in Sight [Krize legitimity Evropské unie - evropský démos v nedohledu]," Současná Evropa, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2013(1), pages 123-140.
    6. Ioannou, Demosthenes & Jamet, Jean-Francois & Kleibl, Johannes, 2015. "Spillovers and euroscepticism," Working Paper Series 1815, European Central Bank.
    7. Sven-Oliver Proksch & James Lo, 2012. "Reflections on the European integration dimension," European Union Politics, , vol. 13(2), pages 317-333, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:12:y:2011:i:2:p:147-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.