IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecdequ/v21y2007i4p299-314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Permanently Failing Organizations? Small Business Recovery After September 11, 2001

Author

Listed:
  • Leigh T. Graham

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, leightg@mit.edu)

Abstract

Small businesses in Lower Manhattan after September 11, 2001, paint a telling portrait of vulnerability after disasters. This qualitative analysis of recovery for small retail and service firms with 50 or fewer employees is based on ethnographic fieldwork, interviews, and documentary research from September 2001 through 2005. A postdisaster emphasis on place-based assistance to firms conflicted with macro-level redevelopment plans for Lower Manhattan. Small business recovery was impeded as aid programs responded to a new sense of urgency, attachment to place, and prestorm conceptions of the neighborhood at the expense of addressing community-wide economic changes accelerated by the disaster. Ingredients for effective programmatic response to the shifting environment and recovery needs of small businesses include (a) long-range planning assistance and relocation options, (b) intelligence on all redevelopment initiatives that affect firms' recovery, and (c) a blend of grants and loans that acknowledges realistic disbursement schedules of private versus public monies.

Suggested Citation

  • Leigh T. Graham, 2007. "Permanently Failing Organizations? Small Business Recovery After September 11, 2001," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 21(4), pages 299-314, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:21:y:2007:i:4:p:299-314
    DOI: 10.1177/0891242407306355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0891242407306355
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0891242407306355?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Beunza Ibáñez & David Stark, 2004. "Resolving identities: Successive crises in a trading room after 9/11," Economics Working Papers 734, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Sep 2005.
    2. Karl Aquino & Murray Bradfield, 2000. "Perceived Victimization in the Workplace: The Role of Situational Factors and Victim Characteristics," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(5), pages 525-537, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ely Zarina Samsudin & Marzuki Isahak & Sanjay Rampal & Ismail Rosnah & Mohd Idzwan Zakaria, 2020. "Individual antecedents of workplace victimisation: The role of negative affect, personality and self‐esteem in junior doctors' exposure to bullying at work," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(5), pages 1065-1082, September.
    2. Gang Wang & Peter Harms & Jeremy Mackey, 2015. "Does it take two to Tangle? Subordinates’ Perceptions of and Reactions to Abusive Supervision," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 487-503, October.
    3. Kris Byron & Blaine Landis, 2020. "Relational Misperceptions in the Workplace: New Frontiers and Challenges," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 223-242, January.
    4. Mundbjerg Eriksen, Tine L. & Hogh, Annie & Hansen, Åse Marie, 2016. "Long-term consequences of workplace bullying on sickness absence," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 129-150.
    5. Adams, Gabrielle S. & Zou, Xi & Inesi, M. Ena & Pillutla, Madan M., 2015. "Forgiveness is not always divine: When expressing forgiveness makes others avoid you," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 130-141.
    6. Dhanakorn Mulaphong, 2023. "Social Undermining in Public Sector Organizations: Examining its Effects on Employees’ Work Attitudes, Behaviors, and Performance," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1229-1248, September.
    7. Cokkie Verschuren & Maria Tims & Annet H. De Lange, 2023. "Beyond Bullying, Aggression, Discrimination, and Social Safety: Development of an Integrated Negative Work Behavior Questionnaire (INWBQ)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(16), pages 1-24, August.
    8. Rodgers, Waymond & Gago Rodríguez, Susana, 2006. "Improving social corporate responsibility : the case of bullying behavior," DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB wb064213, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
    9. Harvey, Michael & Treadway, Darren & Heames, Joyce Thompson, 2006. "Bullying in global organizations: A reference point perspective," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 190-202, June.
    10. Abhijeet K. Vadera & Michael G. Pratt, 2013. "Love, Hate, Ambivalence, or Indifference? A Conceptual Examination of Workplace Crimes and Organizational Identification," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 172-188, February.
    11. ADEGOKE Olusegun Steve & AYANTAYO, Solomon Ojo, 2020. "Organizational Stress and Demographic Variables as Predictors of Workplace Violence in the Telecommunication Industry," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 4(8), pages 461-474, August.
    12. Millo, Yuval & MacKenzie, Donald, 2009. "The usefulness of inaccurate models: Towards an understanding of the emergence of financial risk management," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 638-653, July.
    13. Yejun Zhang & Mark C. Bolino & Kui Yin, 2023. "The Interactive Effect of Perceived Overqualification and Peer Overqualification on Peer Ostracism and Work Meaningfulness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(3), pages 699-716, January.
    14. Booth, Jonathan E. & Park, Tae-Youn & Zhu, Luke (Lei) & Beauregard, T. Alexandra & Gu, Fan & Emery, Cécile, 2018. "Prosocial response to client-instigated victimization: the roles of forgiveness and workgroup conflict," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 85632, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Marr, Jennifer Carson & Thau, Stefan & Aquino, Karl & Barclay, Laurie J., 2012. "Do I want to know? How the motivation to acquire relationship-threatening information in groups contributes to paranoid thought, suspicion behavior, and social rejection," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 285-297.
    16. Yina Mao & Yan Liu & Chunyan Jiang & Iris D. Zhang, 2018. "Why am I ostracized and how would I react? — A review of workplace ostracism research," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 745-767, September.
    17. Sean Valentine & Gary Fleischman & Lynn Godkin, 2018. "Villains, Victims, and Verisimilitudes: An Exploratory Study of Unethical Corporate Values, Bullying Experiences, Psychopathy, and Selling Professionals’ Ethical Reasoning," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 135-154, March.
    18. Al-Karim Samnani & Parbudyal Singh, 2016. "Workplace Bullying: Considering the Interaction Between Individual and Work Environment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 537-549, December.
    19. Simpson, Ace Volkmann & Cunha, Miguel Pina e & Clegg, Stewart, 2015. "Hybridity, sociomateriality and compassion: What happens when a river floods and a city's organizations respond?," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 375-386.
    20. Cihangir Gümüştaş & Nilgün Karataş Gümüştaş, 2023. "Abusive Supervision and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Moderated Mediation Model of Burnout and Organizational Identity," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(4), pages 135-159.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:21:y:2007:i:4:p:299-314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.