IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsr/supplm/v66y2018i3p89-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Invalidation of a Classic Multi-Factorial Econometric FDI Model in Some Ex-Socialist Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Simina – Ioana Brostescu

    (University of Craiova)

  • Gheorghe Savoiu

    (University of Pitesti)

Abstract

In the introductory section are presented the main categories of validated classical foreign direct investment (FDI) models, ending with some of the recently published ones, belonging to the literature of the last decade. A section of methodology presents the main validation tests of the classical econometric model in general. However, the main thrust is the invalidation of a classical model in which FDI is specified in a macroeconomic context starting from GDP value, gross fixed capital formation (FBCF), imports (M) and exports (X), in the case of the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland. Choosing these ex-socialist European economies and presenting the invalidation of country-specific FDI models, while also exemplifying Fisher or Durbin-Watson tests, reflect certain changes in the investors’ image of these economies, and incite discussion of the similarity of invalidations, which outlines the decision not to invest, rather than invest in these economies. A brief final assessment clarifies the value of an article that both invalidates and does not validate, in the perspective of amplified knowledge, a modelling approach describing situations of real statistical and econometric interest.

Suggested Citation

  • Simina – Ioana Brostescu & Gheorghe Savoiu, 2018. "Invalidation of a Classic Multi-Factorial Econometric FDI Model in Some Ex-Socialist Countries," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 66(3), pages 89-97, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsr:supplm:v:66:y:2018:i:3:p:89-97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.revistadestatistica.ro/supliment/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/RRS_03_2018_04en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsr:supplm:v:66:y:2018:i:3:p:89-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adrian Visoiu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stagvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.