IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsr/journl/v60y2012i2p6-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Balanced Scorecard - Instrument Of Strategic Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela STEFANESCU

    (Spiru Haret University)

  • Maria SILIVESTRU

    (National Institute of Statistics Romania)

Abstract

Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is a system of management and an instrument of strategic planning, spread within business and industry, in state public institutions, as well as in non-profit institutions. BSC improves external and internal communication and also monitors the performance of an organization starting from its strategic objectives. In the past, BSC played the part of performance measurement. Later on, the BSC concept evolved and fully became an instrument of strategic planning. This article tries to achieve a translation of the concepts into official statistics, identifying concrete measures to be done and measured by an organization. It is useful for the execution of the organization strategy. It is estimated that the new modern approach of strategic management, respectively BSC, allows the national institutes of statistics to clarify the vision and strategy and translated them into actions.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela STEFANESCU & Maria SILIVESTRU, 2012. "Balanced Scorecard - Instrument Of Strategic Planning," Romanian Statistical Review, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 60(2), pages 6-39, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:rsr:journl:v:60:y:2012:i:2:p:6-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.revistadestatistica.ro/Articole/2012/art3en_rrs2_2012.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ioana Cristina Circa (Buzduga), 2019. "Aspects Relating to the Perspective and Management Strategies of the Balanced Scorecard Method," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 676-680, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsr:journl:v:60:y:2012:i:2:p:6-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adrian Visoiu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stagvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.