IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/terumm/v7y2012i4p63-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility Of Transport Demand Management Through A Bottom-Up Planning Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ali SOLTANI

    (Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran)

  • Ahmad NAMDARIAN

    (University of Art, Isfahan, Iran)

  • Nayereh DAYARIAN

    (Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran)

Abstract

In order to reduce traffic congestion and the associated problems, various policies have been put forward so far. However, it is believed that Transport Demand Management (TDM) offers an effective and economical solution. Since most TDM policies have both positive and negative impacts, public participation is, therefore, an efficient way to achieve better results. This paper attempts to evaluate a set of TDM policies and define their priorities through a Bottom-up Planning (BUP) approach for the metropolitan Shiraz, Iran. In this way, the possibility of developing common principles via the investigation of shared goals within an integrated framework for urban transport policies that are desired for sustainable transport is evaluated. The framework method was utilized through a BUP expert consultation process. A number of experts (n=21) were asked to prioritize the components of each policy package. A set of policy measures as solutions to traffic congestion was provided in three different categories: sustainable transport approach, engineering approach, and traffic restraint approach. Each category included 10 measures which were suggested after a primary survey on the metropolitan's traffic problems. These measures were weighted and rated using the Analytical Hierarchal Process (AHP) technique. Then the Weighted Scoring Method was applied to find performance priorities. Public bus and bicycle infrastructure development were found to be the two most favorite policies. In total, sustainable transport solutions were the most preferred policies in the bottom-up stages. The findings can contribute some insights to future transport planning in order to provide more opportunities for community involvement in planning processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali SOLTANI & Ahmad NAMDARIAN & Nayereh DAYARIAN, 2012. "Feasibility Of Transport Demand Management Through A Bottom-Up Planning Approach," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(4), pages 63-71, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:7:y:2012:i:4:p:63-71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://um.ase.ro/no74/5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Booth, Chris & Richardson, Tim, 2001. "Placing the public in integrated transport planning," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 141-149, April.
    2. Cernea, M.M., 1992. "The Building Blocks of Participation: Testing Bottom-Up Planning," World Bank - Discussion Papers 166, World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marletto, Gerardo & Mameli, Francesca, 2012. "A participative procedure to select indicators of policies for sustainable urban mobility. Outcomes of a national test," MPRA Paper 36433, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Maria Morfoulaki & Glykeria Myrovali & Maria Chatziathanasiou, 2022. "Exploiting Marketing Methods for Increasing Participation and Engagement in Sustainable Mobility Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Luis A. Guzman & Victor A. Cantillo-Garcia & Julian Arellana & Olga L. Sarmiento, 2023. "User expectations and perceptions towards new public transport infrastructure: evaluating a cable car in Bogotá," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 751-771, June.
    4. Chowdhury, Subeh & Ceder, Avishai (Avi) & Schwalger, Bradley, 2015. "The effects of travel time and cost savings on commuters’ decision to travel on public transport routes involving transfers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 151-159.
    5. Kotzebue, Julia R., 2022. "Integrated urban transport infrastructure development: The role of digital social geo-communication in Hamburg's TEN-T improvement," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. de Luca, Stefano, 2014. "Public engagement in strategic transportation planning: An analytic hierarchy process based approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 110-124.
    7. Bailey, Keiron & Grossardt, Ted & Pride-Wells, Michaele, 2007. "Community design of a light rail transit-oriented development using casewise visual evaluation (CAVE)," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 235-254, September.
    8. Hussain, Shahid & Xuetong, Wang & Maqbool, Rashid & Hussain, Mustansar & Shahnawaz, Muhammad, 2022. "The influence of government support, organizational innovativeness and community participation in renewable energy project success: A case of Pakistan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    9. Nathan Teklemariam, 2022. "Sustainable Development Goals and Equity in Urban Planning: A Comparative Analysis of Chicago, São Paulo, and Delhi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    10. Franceschini, Simone & Marletto, Gerardo, 2015. "Assessing the benefits and the shortcomings of participation – findings from a test in Bari (Italy)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 33-42.
    11. Bulckaen, Jeroen & Keseru, Imre & Macharis, Cathy, 2016. "Sustainability versus stakeholder preferences: Searching for synergies in urban and regional mobility measures," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 40-49.
    12. Kathryn Gomersall, 2021. "Governance of resettlement compensation and the cultural fix in rural China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(1), pages 150-167, February.
    13. Pereira, Rafael H. M. & Boisjoly, Geneviève, 2021. "Social issues in transport planning: an introduction," SocArXiv pn2qd, Center for Open Science.
    14. Loo, Becky P.Y. & Tsoi, Ka Ho & Banister, David, 2020. "Recent experiences and divergent pathways to transport decoupling," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    15. Wong, Dan & Baker, Douglas, 2014. "Improving US airport taxicab services through governance arrangements," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 126-131.
    16. Sönke Beckmann & Sebastian Trojahn & Hartmut Zadek, 2023. "Process Model for the Introduction of Automated Buses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-36, September.
    17. Dawei Li & Yujia Zhang & Cheng Li, 2019. "Mining Public Opinion on Transportation Systems Based on Social Media Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-15, July.
    18. Radomíra Jordová & Hana Brůhová-Foltýnová, 2021. "Rise of a New Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning Paradigm in Local Governance: Does the SUMP Make a Difference?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    19. F. Mameli & G. Marletto, 2009. "Can national survey data be used to select a core set of indicators for monitoring the sustainability of urban mobility policies?," Working Paper CRENoS 200911, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    20. Baumann, Christiane & White, Stuart, 2012. "Making better choices: a systematic comparison of adversarial and collaborative approaches to the transport policy process," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 83-90.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:7:y:2012:i:4:p:63-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Colesca Sofia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.