This paper examines the welfare effects of fee splitting or kickbacks paid by one physician to another in return for patient referrals. This practice is regarded as unethical and illegal in most cases, but it is shown that in a principal-agent context it is possible for fee splitting to offer incentives which actually improve patient welfare. Fee splitting occurs when there is a divergence between price and the referral partner's marginal opportunity cost. A restructuring of fee levels to yield physicians equal net income per unit time would remove the incentive for fee splitting. In the absence of this reform it is shown that fee splitting may induce the first-contact physician to refer instead of performing a lower quality procedure himself, and can also be a tool for eroding specialist monopoly power.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().
Related research
Keywords:
Other versions of this item:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)