Risk Management after the Great Crash
AbstractThis study takes a closer look at the role of risk (mis)management by financial institutions in the emergence of the Great Crash. It is explained that prior to the crisis too much reliance was placed on the quantitative side of risk management, while not enough attention was paid to qualitative risk management. In this context it is argued that there is an urgent need for dealing more effectively with inherent weaknesses related to institutional- and organisational aspects, governance issues and incentives. More sophistication and a further refinement of existing quantitative risk management models and techniques is not the most important or effective response to the uncertainties and risks associated with a fast-moving financial landscape. In fact, too much faith in a new generation of complex risk models might even lead to even more spectacular risk management problems as during the Great Crash. Against this backdrop, the most promising approach for improving risk management systems is by providing a coherent framework for addressing systematically weaknesses and problems that are of a qualitative nature. However, given the inadequate and very imperfect academic knowledge and tools that are available, risk management as a scientific discipline is not capable of dealing adequately with fundamental uncertainty in the financial system, even if a coherent picture associated with the aforementioned qualitative issues and problems is being provided. This perspective is providing an additional motivation to those authorities that are contemplating to constrain or restructure parts of the architecture of the new financial landscape.
Download InfoTo our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Capco Institute in its journal Journal of Financial Transformation.
Volume (Year): 28 (2010)
Issue (Month): ()
Contact details of provider:
Postal: 120 Broadway, 29th Floor New York, NY 10271
Phone: +1 212 284 8600
Web page: http://www.capco.com/
Financial Crisis; Quantitative and Qualitative Risk management;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- G01 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Financial Crises
- G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
- G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
- G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Hans J Blommestein & Anja Hubig, 2012. "Is the standard micro portfolio approach to sovereign debt management still appropriate?," BIS Papers chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), Threat of fiscal dominance?, volume 65, pages 141-155 Bank for International Settlements.
- Hans J. Blommestein & Anja Hubig, 2012. "A Critical Analysis of the Technical Assumptions of the Standard Micro Portfolio Approach to Sovereign Debt Management," OECD Working Papers on Sovereign Borrowing and Public Debt Management 4, OECD Publishing.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Springett).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.